Talk:High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 24.143.229.211 in topic 'Intel' Frame
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Importance rating
editUntil we know more about the scope of the suit, and how it affects the economy of cali, we cannot give it a high rating for the cali/sfba projects. this needs a lot more information, aside from its rating.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Title
editThis isn't a proper noun or official/formal title, so shouldn't the article title be lower case (High-tech employee antitrust litigation)?--ukexpat (talk) 20:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
- There's no magic formula to what makes something a proper noun, but to me High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation is, in the appropriate context, perfectly acceptable as a proper noun in the same way that other borderline examples like "Cuban Missile Crisis" are acceptable proper nouns. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
'Intel' Frame
editThere is a frame with information on Intel corporation at the bottom of this article. It appears out of place and unrelated to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.229.211 (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)