Wikipedia

Talk:High-definition optical disc format war

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page
edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image File:Blu-ray Disc.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:42, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please don't use the term "war"

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid. There were no soldiers and armies, so it wasn't a war. Thanks 79.181.211.28 (talk) 11:29, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

You are mistaken. It is not only tabloids that call format wars "wars". Encyclopedias use the terminology chosen by reputable sources, simple as that. 90.229.34.175 (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

tipping point

edit
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I object to describing 2008 as "the tipping point" of the war. A tipping point of WWII could be Stalingrad.

But after the tipping point there would be much of the war to remain, and indeed, it would not be obvious to contemporary parties that the tipping point actually were one at the time.

None of this is appropriate for the format war. The 2008 decision by studios weren't "a tipping point". It was the death blow, evidenced by Toshiba's surrender only a month later.

I do not think there can be consensus of any "tipping points" of this war; too much happened behind closed doors for that.

But what we can do is to describe the 2008 studio decisions, and what would be appropriate would be to use language such as "the deciding blow" or "the final nail in the coffin" or somesuch, making it clear that there was no or next to no more fighting left to be done by that time. 90.229.34.175 (talk) 12:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

"Won the war"

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments4 people in discussion

Until there is an extensively overwhelming case for a 'victor', I don't think claiming Blu-Ray won is a legitimate statement to any degree. Almost all computers use exclusively HD DVD drives, as do plenty of modern devices of all kinds. The fact that Toshiba (and Toshiba alone) stopped producing HD DVD players is not an indisputable victory. --Sgtlion (talk) 23:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reliable secondary sources of the time gave Blu-ray the nod as victor--and some of those sources are cited in the article. Even now, it's not difficult to find articles online from the period declaring Blu-ray the winner--becoming the optical medium of choice for distributing high-def titles. If you think otherwise, or if more recent observers now see it differently, please provide some sources that make the point. Nothing is in stone, but WP:V as always. Barte (talk) 06:51, 11 March 2014 (UTC) Just to add one more--here's Times 2009 listing of HD DVD among "The 10 Biggest Tech Failures of the Last Decade" Barte (talk) 15:37, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
"Almost all computers use exclusively HD DVD drives" ... er, no. 62.56.57.66 (talk) 10:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)Reply


well I think the main issue is that as a format neither HD DVD or Blu Ray have been that successful. The rise of internet downloads and streaming have made the formats largely obsolete. Blu Ray never really supplanted ordinary DVD's as the main format for disc based media, and ordinary DVD's continue to persist in a way which VHS did not when DVD was first introduced. For example when looking at the top selling DVD vs top selling Blu-Ray in the USA we see that the DVD format still seems dominant. Blu-ray: http://www.the-numbers.com/home-market/bluray-sales/2014 DVD: http://www.the-numbers.com/home-market/dvd-sales/2014 I would not hesitate to say this is the case in other markets, a cursory look on the Amazon UK store at the DVD/Blu Ray section seems to show many more DVD than Blu Ray on sale. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fdsdh1 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 10 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Given the huge rise of digital downloads, were there really any winners in the HD DVD/Blu-ray format war? (Fdsdh1 (talk) 19:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC))Reply

Your argument seems plausible, but we need a better reference than these raw numbers. The reference needs to interpret the numbers, as you have, to make the case. Barte (talk) 03:35, 11 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 4 external links on High definition optical disc format war. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:17, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on High-definition optical disc format war. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:48, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on High-definition optical disc format war. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:17, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on High-definition optical disc format war. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:High-definition_optical_disc_format_war&oldid=1207515220"