Talk:High-water mark (computer security)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Merge Bell-LaPadula Model
editProposing that High watermark be merged into Bell-LaPadula model as it is an extension of that model & the current article is very short. Dthvt 04:45, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
Removing proposal due to objections made on the BLP discussion page. Dthvt 22:44, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Promotion on read-only access
editThe entry as stated today implies that opening an object for reading causing the object's security level to be promoted. Is this correct? It contradicts the earlier content of the article and I don't have the cited reference to arbitrate against. Dthvt 21:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on High-water mark (computer security). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110716113909/http://www.isso.sparta.com/documents/lomac.pdf to http://www.isso.sparta.com/documents/lomac.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:54, 2 April 2017 (UTC)