Talk:High Aim 6
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the High Aim 6 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Rewrite?
editIs there a rewrite pending, here? As it is, the article's more or less a series of cut-and-pastes from the news story and press release in the links section. If the original contributor(s) intend to leave it as is, I could take a crack at it. —Eric S. Smith 15:43, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
edit
editGo ahead and clean it up. I found so little info on the ship I was compelled to make the wiki entry. (my first)
I searched for hours, and without copying the AP text, I have nothing really to go on.
- I cleaned it up a tad and fixed a few relevant missing links. Also, Mysteriously, no crew were on board the vessel, Mr Witheridge said., who is Mr. Witheridge?
- It may also be worthy to note that AFMA is an acronym for Australian Fisheries Management Authority. Not sure how to properly do that as it doesn't already have a Wiki entry. Kurt 04:17, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Toothbrushes?
edit- Why does the article particularly mention toothbrushes not being missing? Are they usually the first personal items to go during the mysterious abondonment of a nautical vessel?
- The toothbrushes are mentioned in the Sydney Morning Herald article “Authorities baffled over abandoned fishing vessel,” upon which this article is based. Removing the reference can only help make our article look like less of a straight lift… —Eric S. Smith 01:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
Fate of the ship?
editOur article, based on a press release from AFMA about plans to shink the ship as a reef habitat, says that the ship was scuttled off of the coast of Broome. It seems that this may not in fact have happened. These articles, in particular the ABC one with its photographic evidence, look pretty conclusive: the ship was broken up and landfilled.
—Eric S. Smith 01:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
The "High Aim 6" was not sunk offshore as expected by local sportfishermen. She was dragged ashore and ripped apart by heavy equipment, transfered to dump trucks and hauled to the local landfil for a final restin place. Kenny Sullivan 209.209.140.19 01:54, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
Updated Article
editI updated the article with some info on the ship's origins and will continue to add more detail as I find it. I'm not very capable when it comes yo uploading photos, but here's a link where there's a GREAT photo if a more capable editor wants to tackle it:
I also added the WikiProject Paranormal banner becuase our project covers Ghost Ships.Lisapollison 16:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- OOPS - my bad - the photo is not of the High Aim 6 but of another ghost ship I was working on, the Jian Seng - sorry about that.Lisapollison 16:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
Rudder Detail
editTo the best of my knowledge, a locked rudder has no effect on a drifting vessel. There may be some heretofore unknown application of physics involved —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.65.56.124 (talk) 01:47, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Category
editDoes this really belong in the category of ghost ships? Crash Underride 19:00, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- Found adrift with the entire crew mysteriously missing (and repeatedly referred to as a "ghost ship" in media reports - example). Why not? 58.8.15.76 (talk) 19:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
- And then one of the crew was found, and alleges mutiny occured. Quite believable and hardly paranormal.124.170.142.104 (talk) 16:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on High Aim 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050212173323/http://www.news24.com:80/News24/World/0,6119,2-10_1308695,00.html to http://www.news24.com/News24/World/0,6119,2-10_1308695,00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:56, 16 January 2016 (UTC)