Talk:High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program
(Redirected from Talk:High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program)
Latest comment: 5 months ago by 172.58.182.49 in topic Only one or many
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Only one or many
editWe only get told another Alaskan haarp facility and they act like it is only a single research facility now in the hands of the university but actually there are many many haarp sites around the world. Can you find one in your country. 49.197.220.108 (talk) 08:01, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have found 4 so far in Australia but have been told there maybe a couple more. 49.197.220.108 (talk) 08:05, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
- There's only one HAARP facility. However, there's 2 ionospheric research facilities in other countries that are active. 172.58.182.49 (talk) 03:51, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Dead links
editThere are some dead links I've found while browsing the page: links to the references 36 and 40, in the conspiracy theory section. What do we do about this ? There's probably more, since some of them are dated to the 90's, but I haven't checked them all. Would be a good idea to do that, and fix the dead links. Scarletwisp (talk) 09:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I have fixed one here. It's easy: search the story title and byline on Google, or try the Wayback machine. Replace the url in the citation. - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:16, 27 March 2024 (UTC)