Talk:High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Firestar47 in topic Catherine Ashton
For previous discussions, see: Talk:High Representative for Common Foreign and Security Policy

Source

edit

Source for conditions of employment of the HR is here:

Maybe somebody with more time than me can fit it into the article. Regards, Anameofmyveryown (talk) 01:38, 11 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Gender

edit

Just a quick note for when the person occupying the position changes - remember that some of the title translations in the infobox are actually in the feminine gender - they will need to be changed if Ashton's sucessor is male. —what a crazy random happenstance 03:14, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

File:Ashton2.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Ashton2.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Ashton2.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 3 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

New table

edit

New table was added because it takes less space and I think is much more user-firendly for phone users. It also provides the same data as the old table did.Sredina (talk) 16:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

If you have a problem with the table widths in Wikipedia I suggest that you take this up more formally as this would be a Wikipedia-wide change. There is a standard table width and this is not the location to start a debate on this issue. I would also add that while your table is less wide it is far longer and also uses substantially more bytes which will increase loading times which is a greater issue on mobile phones than on laptops etc. Ebonelm (talk) 16:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Josep Borrell

edit

In my opinion he should not be added yet, because he was not confirmed by anyone yet. The same was done in the case of von der Leyen as Comm Pres.Sredina (talk) 16:03, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

As you have now added Josep Borrell to your version of the table I will assume that this is no longer an issue. Ebonelm (talk) 16:00, 22 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Catherine Ashton

edit

The section on Catherine Ashton claims that she was criticized after the Haiti relief effort for not visiting Haiti. This is wrong. Ashton visited Haiti a month after the earthquake when aid was still ongoing. The criticism was not going before that. Firestar47 (talk) 20:02, 18 October 2023 (UTC)Reply