Talk:Highcross Leicester
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject class rating
editThis article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
Naming controversies
editThis section is interesting, was reported in the national press, and is fully referenced. Please do not remove this section from the article, and discuss any changes on this page before making them. JRawle (Talk) 10:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
- The thisisleicestershire website doesn't appear to keep archived copies of all Leicester Mercury articles. Therefore I've accessed and re-read all the relevant articles via the NewsUK service, and cited the full titles of the articles as references on this article. If anyone wants to read the articles, you can access them via your local library's website. Leicester City Libraries subscribe to the service, as will public libraries across the UK. JRawle (Talk) 12:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Highcross Leicester article
editSomeone wrote a comment (inappropriately on the article itself) calling for a separate article about Hightcross Leicester. Once the centre is officially opened under its new name, this article should be renamed Highcross Leicester (with a redirect from The Shires). The two centres are one and the same thing. There should not be a separate article for each. One article can discuss the history of the centre with both of its names. JRawle (Talk) 10:43, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Transport Links
editI don't feel that the "Transport Links" section has any encyclopedic value. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Any arguments for keeping it before I delete it?--Michig (talk) 15:27, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- How about just listing the buses that serve it, not the stops? MSalmon (talk) 15:35, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see any value in that either.--Michig (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, then get rid of it because I didn't put it in MSalmon (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok could a link go in for St Margarets Bus Station that is near by ? Sowhyman (talk) 15:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- This information doesn't belong anywhere in Wikipedia.--Michig (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok could a link go in for St Margarets Bus Station that is near by ? Sowhyman (talk) 15:38, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, then get rid of it because I didn't put it in MSalmon (talk) 15:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- I don't see any value in that either.--Michig (talk) 15:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This whole section is a fork from Leicester City Centre bus stops, which will shortly get deleted at AfD.--Michig (talk) 15:39, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Highcross Leicester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110616153159/http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/diIsplayNode.jsp?nodeId=132943&command=displayContent&sourceNode=132546&contentPK=21115498 to http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/diIsplayNode.jsp?nodeId=132943&command=displayContent&sourceNode=132546&contentPK=21115498
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:41, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Highcross Leicester. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090608051233/http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/news/Highcross-hits-million-visitor-mark/article-336946-detail/article.html to http://www.thisisleicestershire.co.uk/news/Highcross-hits-million-visitor-mark/article-336946-detail/article.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:04, 29 November 2017 (UTC)