Talk:Highland Railway

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Redrose64 in topic WW1 coal traffic

Untitled

edit

I really don't think that the current page on the HRC is particulary good, which is why I deleted it.

It doesn't tell you anything of interest and is incredibly vague about what its trying to inform the reader.

Why don't we try and re-write it under the headings that I had suggested instead of the mish-mash of cobbled together information that doesn't tell you anything interesting or explain any of its ideas in any depth. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by NeilScott (talkcontribs) 12:21, March 4, 2006.

Above comment

edit

I agree with the above - whoever wrote it. The Highland Railway proper had a very limited area insofar as its tracks went. The talk about the three Lines is mixing up the modern usage of the system with the historical one - for eaxample the Far North Line is simply the name given by today's operating company, and is not part of the history of the line.

It is therefore much better to treat this as an historical article - after all the Railway ceased existence as such in 1923, and to finish by saying .... "today the still existing HR lines are operated etc etc". I have changed the opening sentence to be a broader statement, and have then put the openings in a chronological order. Peter Shearan 18:27, 11 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Locomotives and rolling stock

edit

No article about a pre-grouping railway can be complete with details of the above, surely? Peter Shearan 18:04, 22 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Highland Railway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:41, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

WW1 coal traffic

edit

It is suggested in the text that the coal for the Grand Fleet at Scapa Flow was moved by rail rather than by the previous coastal steamers. Reference is made to the book The Highland Railway by HA Vallance and revised by Charles Clinker. The book does not make this suggestion and makes it clear that coal for the fleet was by coastal steamer from Grangemouth. 2A00:23C5:E401:C001:F58E:B541:A785:D3CD (talk) 15:09, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

These coal trains are mentioned in several books, not just Vallance, and are sometimes termed "Jellicoe specials". --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply