Talk:Hill and Barlow

Notability

OK, I'll bite:

• The firm is notable by virtue of its notable alumni. Anyone reading Deval Patrick's biography, for example, might want to know about the firms he had worked for.
• I don't see anything non-neutral; the status of an "elite" law firm is pretty well-defined and NPOV, except perhaps at the margins, and that word is used in the linked article.

Non-neutral: "The firm had been one of the city's oldest and most elite firms". Per who? Where is a source for this?

Notability: Notability is not conferred by the individuals who worked for a company. They are notable; but what about this firm is notable? I'm not suggesting deletion here, but there isn't a case made here for why exactly this firm is in any way notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Isotope23 (talk • contribs)

Please sign your talk page comments.

See WP:N. Something is notable if multiple independent reliable sources have written non-trivial pieces about it. Hill and Barlow clearly qualify,[1][2] and I'm removing the tag. -- THF 01:48, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

harold wild( im his son jionathan wild) retained u to fight for our house at 26 william street in 1987? u were referred by rose hagazain no docket no. done in superior court.. it contained my divorce from elizabeth wild who sued him for his house as my asset i believe josh davis handeled rep. id like to talk to hom —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.24.206.73 (talk) 14:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)