Talk:Hillel Slovak/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 15:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: Two found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Well written, complies with key elements of MoS

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Ref #5 failed verification.

   Wait, have you watched the episode? All of the facts in the article are in the episode. Basilisk4u (talk) 18:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

   No I haven't watched the episode. There is no mention of the episode on the reference supplied. It may have been there once, but it isn't now. If you are citing a TV show please use the correct format as per {{cite episode}}, specifying the exact time that the statements appear.Jezhotwells (talk) 00:15, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

   Oh! I'm sorry. The link seems to have redirected to a general Behind the Music page. I will try to find the times that the statements appear in the episode. Basilisk4u (talk) 01:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

   Okay, I have reformatted the episode stuff, I hope it is better now. Basilisk4u (talk) 21:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

   Other references appear to be RS, I assume good faith for off-line sources, no evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough, without needless trivia

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Captioned, File:EarlyRHCP.jpg needs a specific fair use rationale for use in this article, see the notice on the file page. There is now a non-free FUR for this article, it is lacking for other articles that use the image. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, just two issues to fix. On hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:29, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

   Fine, all in order now, passing as Ga. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:43, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

   Awesome!! Thanks so much. Basilisk4u (talk) 01:53, 20 March 2011 (UTC)