Talk:Himalayan fossil hoax

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I think this article deserves a better rating than "start-class"

Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The article is comprehensive, well structured, and well sourced. I think it exceeds the expectations for "start-class", and could do with another review. I'm brand new to wikipedia, so sorry if this is the wrong avenue for this! Micahtchi (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Fully agree. I’ve changed it to C class. GraziePrego (talk) 03:13, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Awesome! I am curious though, why? What differentiates it from higher classes? Micahtchi (talk) 03:14, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Peer-reviewed journal article published

Latest comment: 15 days ago3 comments3 people in discussion

The WikiJournal of Science has recently accepted a peer-reviewed article on this page, submitted by Chhandama. You can read the full peer review comments. If there are no oppositions, we would like to incorporate the peer-reviewed version into the existing Wikipedia article. Courtesy pinging @Micahtchi as they commented about the quality of the article just above. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 17:29, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

No oppositions from me:) Micahtchi (talk) 05:16, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sounds fantastic! Happily support incorporating this version. GraziePrego (talk) 05:19, 7 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic