This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arab world, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Arab world on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Arab worldWikipedia:WikiProject Arab worldTemplate:WikiProject Arab worldArab world articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The recent changes by IP 2607:FEA8:2B80:1D0B:49DF:644F:3D56:B826 came up in Recent Changes flagged as "Likely to have problems". Presumably that was due to the nature of this article, and possibly some of the key words used in the edit. While the edit seemed strongly biased, it also shed light on the logic behind some of the statistics cited, so an undo seemed unwarranted.
Since the edit was directly before a citation, I read the citation to see if that opinion was expressed in that document, and I did not find it there. At that point, I intended to move the citation to be closer to it's referenced text, but while performing additional research, the text was moved to the beginning of the section.
My additional research confirmed both the interpretation of Hindu icons as idols, and that the Sunni Muslim prohibitions on idol worship were particularly strongly enforced in Saudi Arabia. I therefore rephrased the edit in terms more suited for a neutral point of view and added my new citation.
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments5 people in discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To not merge; uncontested objection and no support; independent notability and readers are best served by having the content separate. Klbrain (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
.svg){kind=small}
