Talk:Hippo Family Club

This page was proposed for deletion by NawlinWiki (talk · contribs) on 14 October 2009 with the comment:
no independent sources demonstrating notability
It was contested by Apoc2400 (talk · contribs) on 2009-10-21 with the comment:
This is actually quite well-known in Japan.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education Low‑importance

	Education portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from Transnational College of Lex was copied or moved into Hippo Family Club with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

no independent sources demonstrating notability

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not sure I understand this reason for proposing the deletion of this article. LEX and the Hippo Family Club are real phenomena that exist and have sources with contacts that can be used if needs be. The fact that these institutions exist, and that there are real people, real families taking part in them, I think, is enough to warrant their "notability."

Or is the presence of an article denoting real existing groups based on research being spun off as self-promotion? These phenomena are referenced in quite a few blogs, though admittedly, they lack reference in say, major media outlets and journals. Is it not enough that contactable sources can be found on the websites provided?

I browse WikiPedia quite often, and come across quite a few articles that lack "independent sources demonstrating notability." Is there a reason this particular article is being singled out? I hope the WikiPedia police are being fair and sweeping through their entire encyclopedia for articles without "independent sources demonstrating notability."KogeJoe (talk) 06:05, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hippo Family Club. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131018222843/http://www.lexlrf.org/Our%20CDs%20%26%20Books/TCL.htm to http://www.lexlrf.org/Our%20CDs%20%26%20Books/TCL.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic