Talk:Hips Don't Lie

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Binksternet in topic Credited songwriters

Where did that genre come from?

edit

Yea...i've listen to this at least at least a 100x now, and there is no hint of any R&B rythmes anywhere in this song. This is stricty a 'Salsa-Cumbia + Reggaeton beat' inspired song, and is in perfect description of Shakira's description of the song. Now maybe if they'd said it got a bit of rap influences, that'd make a bit more sense, but as it is, this song has no r&b influences known or described by the artist who made it. O.K! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.229.72.90 (talk) 12:52, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

This is what confusing me. A few months ago, the genre was just reggaeton, then it turned to Latin pop, then to reggaeton, then to cumbia, salsa and pop. What is the genre really? Can't we put all of them are once like this: Latin pop, reggaeton, cumbia, salsa? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.147.7 (talk) 20:48, 20 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sales

edit

The song sold over 10 Million worldwide, therefore, sales need to be mentioned somewhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.81.101.13 (talk) 00:45, 8 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I expected better from wiki

edit

OK, my friend has an updated version of the Media Traffic points sales thingy, and according to it, this song is now a little over 13x platinum not 9x. I'd expect wikipedia to have the latest updates about things like this but ohh well. Please upate the sales chart info. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 63.215.27.138 (talk) 15:49, 27 April 2007 (UTC).Reply

      Or, you know, you could do it yourself.  There's no one here whose job it is any more than yours.24.199.80.144 (talk) 21:29, 27 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


Fly me to the Moon

edit

This song uses the same chord sequence as 'Fly me to the moon'. Worth mentioning, and possibly wondering whether they paid anyone for what might amount to copyright infringement?

Music and structure

edit

As one would see if they visited the We Belong Together article, I believe that Hips Don't Lie requires a section documenting its musical structure. I am aware that it is not the simplest task to complete, but because this song has received incredible radio airplay and music-video rotation, its success should be summarized into one section; this includes the music and not just the chart performance, though both are definitely important. Would anybody like to partake in the commission? Help is appreciated! —Eternal Equinox | talk 23:57, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

ARIA digital track peak

edit

It peaked at #10 on the Australian Digital Track Chart.

Don't you mean #1? ARIA Digital ChartsHips Don't Lie: HP (High Position) #1. - EmeZxX 07:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Terrible World Cup song

edit

How can I inform FIFA that this song is terrible?

First, that doesnt come to be discussed here. Second, the song is great for the world cup, in his Bamboo version. I was on the states for the final game (im from colombia, by the way) and it was so damm great listening Colombia present at such event. Anyway, that doesnt matter


Nope the song sucks,little kids made it famous.


Nope the song is awesome. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.30.135.163 (talk) 13:58, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Can't hit the note

edit

When I try to sing along I can't follow Shakira's voice. What note is that, or progression of notes or whatever. - Peregrinefisher 06:43, 7 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Which note can't you reach? -- AnemoneProjectors (talk) 20:33, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

How about you don't sing it...

first number one

edit

I've changed the statement that this was their first number one in the UK and the US- the US part is true, but Wyclef Jean had two number ones in the UK with the Fugees. -- Dandelions

But it was thier first collaborative #1.

edit

I'm about to remove the external links to the videos since they are likely to infringe the copyright of the video's producers, and we have no way of knowing if apkguy2006 at You Tube, the submitter of the video, owns the copyright.

EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 18:12, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup needed

edit

This article is swamped with excessively detailed chart, sales and airplay statistics. Too much of this is a great way of hiding genuinely relevant information, which is exactly what's happening here. Extraordinary Machine 16:22, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

edit

Today's 25th most popular article is "Hips Don't Lie"; 5000 people have accessed the page today.[1] -- Zanimum 15:29, 1 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Las Caderas no Mienten

edit

She recorded a Spanish version for this song, including a music video. Not to mention she's performed the Spanish version at events. Nobody has mentioned it. --Speakslowly 05:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Canadian chart

edit

What is with the obsession of the person who signs in with different accounts and IP addresses and removes just the Canadian chart information? Seems like a strange thing to be preoccupied with... is it someone who is anti-Shakira? or anti-Canadian? or anti-Canadian music charts? or anti-Shakira-having-a-hit-song-in-Canada? Never leaves an edit summary either. It's tedious. - eo 04:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I'm assuming it's because Canada was the only English-speaking country where the song failed to reach number one; it peaked at number two there. Velten 21:37, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Charts reaching number one

edit

Could we maybe add a table of charts where it reached number one, and say for how many weeks? As it was more than one week for many, it seems to me that it would be quite useful. Something like

Chart Weeks at #1
Chart here some number

- Рэдхот(tce) 17:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Jerry Rivera plagiarism issue?

edit

I included two references to the sampling of Jerry Rivera's "Amores Como El Nuestro"... however, those two references I sourced point to a plagiarism issue with Shakira possibly not asking permission to use the sample. Can someone find more information on that? Could that be used within the song as a sub-section dealing with the issue? --PaladinHero1 18:49, 7 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Hipsdontlie.jpg

edit
 

Image:Hipsdontlie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:33, 5 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wrong chart info

edit

The article stated that the song reached number six on Sweden's hitchart, while it only reached forty-five. It may have peaked higher on the download chart, but seeing as how that chart doesn't exist anymore I don't find it relevant.

Spanish version

edit

The name of the spanish version is NOT Las caderas no mienten (será, será). IS Será, será (las caderas no mienten).

Actually, the official spanish title of the song is "Hips Don't Lie (En Español)", so everybody (and Shakira helself) translate the title to "Las Caderas No Mienten" and "Será, Será" is only the first verse of the chorus. Whichever is allright, "Las Caderas No Mienten (Será, Será)" or "Será, Será (Las Caderas No Mienten".McMare's 08:45, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

This article is far, far too long.

edit

Sweet Jesus, it's only a song! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.251.235.92 (talk) 21:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)Reply


So? This song is so good that it deserves it! 93.138.20.6 (talk) 15:38, 17 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Grammar/Wording/Editing/etc.

edit

Would anyone care to do a thorough re-edit and/or organization of this article? Unfortunately, it seems to be lacking in quality grammar ("was the #1 song of the year. A first for both Shakira and Wyclef Jean.") and cohesion/organization:

and I'm too afraid to do any of this myself. Thanks, Collegebookworm 06:14, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Pressing Charges

edit

"...Jerry Rivera openly accused Shakira of plagiarizing the opening trumpets without his knowing, though saying he would not press charges on her."

  • Okay, first, "pressing charges" is normally used to describe criminal matters, not something civil like plagiarism or perhaps more accurately, copyright violation. (Yes, yes, I know copyright violation can be criminal but that's really stretching it in a case like this.)
  • Second, when speaking of "pressing charges" I think the term is usually "against someone" and not "on someone."

Not #1 in 55 Countries

edit

This article claims that "Hips Don't Lie" went to #1 in "at least 55 countries." This incorrect and is not supported by a reliable source - the O2 could just include that for promotion of her shows. Madonna's song "Hung Up" has the Guinness World Record of topping the charts in the most countries, at 45. This was listed in the 2007 issue, published at the end of 2006, after "Hips Don't Lie" had already charted in most, if not all, countries. Not only this, but Wikipedia's own list of record charts only displays 37 countries (or 38 if Belgium's are counted seperately), many of which the song did not reach #1 in. In the chart performance section of the article, only 25 countires are listed where it reached #1. -- 99.128.196.86 (talk) 19:20, 29 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Hips Don't Lie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:21, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Hips Don't Lie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:30, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hips Don't Lie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hips Don't Lie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hips Don't Lie. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wonder

edit

Producer(s) lists 'Wonder'. If that ain't Stevie then it needs to be rewritten clearer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.225.0.12 (talk) 22:10, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Done--☾Loriendrew☽ (ring-ring) 21:34, 25 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Producer credits

edit

I don’t think Shakira is the sole producer? Elsewhere says differently 50.220.156.130 (talk) 07:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Credited songwriters

edit

Different sources credit different songwriters. BMI says that seven people are credited: Omar Alfanno (listed twice), Luis Días, Jerry Duplessis, Wyclef Jean, LaTavia Parker, Archie Pena and Shakira. The printed single liner notes give only five names, leaving out Luis Días and Archie Pena. The single credits "Archi Pena" (spelling variant) as a percussionist, along with other drummers. Of course, Luis Días is a co-composer of the song "Dance Like This" by Wyclef Jean. Binksternet (talk) 16:51, 6 March 2023 (UTC)Reply