Talk:Hispano-Suiza
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Hispano-Suiza
editI have seen pictures of a new Hispano-Suiza supercar. I don't know how old it is, but it is certainly worth noting.
- The brand has been used without permission from "La Hispano Suiza Fábrica de Automóviles SA" (Grupo Peralda) or SAFRAN, holders of the rights to the historic name and brand. info --Nachx (talk) 16:17, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
According to this link their are two different groups using the name at this year's Geneva show - with prospect for ensuing legal battle.
https://www.topgear.com/car-news/geneva-motor-show/will-real-hispano-suiza-please-stand — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.140.106.52 (talk) 09:25, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
infobox
editShould use template:Infobox Company or template:Infobox Defunct Company to make similar look than other car company articles --Typ932 T·C 17:09, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
- The company still exists: http://www.hispano-suiza-sa.com PpPachy (talk) 18:49, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hispano-Suiza. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100613010259/http://www.forum-auto.com/automobiles-mythiques-exception/section5/sujet381347.htm to http://www.forum-auto.com/automobiles-mythiques-exception/section5/sujet381347.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061209165340/http://www.motorspain.com/coches/Hispano_Suiza/ to http://www.motorspain.com/coches/Hispano_Suiza/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
- REPLAY 91.225.19.226 (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
Linking to non-existent articles can only be justified in the context that an article does not currently exist, but really SHOULD - and in fact very probably WILL, when someone gets around to it (or even finishes the one they are working on). But even in a case like this, they can be confusing and a source of dismay and confusion - not to mention weeping and gnashing of teeth - especially among the "newbies" and non-editing users.
They do not, I trow, belong in avowedly "anti-confusion" things like header notes. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 22:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)