Talk:Histophilus somni
Latest comment: 2 years ago by PrimeBOT in topic Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Histophilus somni be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Venessa.ibsen, Jessica.debruyne, Saf782, Jessica.jeb355, Jessica.jmj141. Peer reviewers: Lauren.lmb242, Kendra.tod, Amanda.amc513, Fiona.moser, Cah656, Jessie.jkh912, Kaylan.ginther, MadisonAudeau, Kaitlan.Linnell.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Proposing merge from Histophilus and Histophilosis to Histophilus somni
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of this discussion was to merge. DferDaisy (talk) 00:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
- Merge - Histophilus is a stub for the monotypic genus. Histophilosis is just a common name, aguably, and also a stub. Merge all to species, Histophilus somni. --Nessie (talk) 22:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA/WP:MONOTYPICFLORA (or whatever the equivalent is for bacteria), and WP:MERGEREASON. It makes sense to discuss the infection along side the pathogen until the point when the sheer length of description of either becomes unwieldy and cumbersome, warranting a WP:SIZESPLIT. There are far too many isolated scattered stubs lacking centralized context. A single article covering two very closely related concepts is a better resource for readers than multiple stubs. The bacterium itself should be the primary article title. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:14, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
- Merge — per previous statements. DferDaisy (talk) 00:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.