Talk:Historicity (philosophy)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Maybe Henry Adams's theory of Historical Acceleration demands mention here?
Benastan 04:36, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
The Henry Adams theory belongs here just as much as anything that's already here, so why not?
But it's remarkable that so much space is given to the idea of the "end of history" without any mention of Hegel, who originally thought it up... Maybe someone would care to fix this?70.23.72.238 (talk) 02:21, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure Fukuyama should be emphasized. He's more of a commentator than philosopher. To echo the previous comment, a mention of Hegel would be more appropriate. (174.95.41.59 (talk) 08:39, 11 November 2016 (UTC))
end of history?
editAlso perhaps mention of Technological singularity is warranted...Cgmusselman (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Link to the other article on this subject
editThis article--"Historicity (philosophy)"--should have a link at the top to the other, main article on "Historicity." Leedurhamstone (talk) 21:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)