Talk:Historiographic metafiction
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Timrb in topic Is there a This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. Please help improve it to make it understandable to non-experts, without removing the technical details. (Learn how and when to remove this message) tag?
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The writing of this article is terrible and muddles whatever tiny scrap of actual information may present in a fog of completely meaningless adjectives and almost comically incomprehensible jargon. Text like this makes me want to gouge my brain out with a spoon. Will somebody please re-write this in plain English?
P.S. I wrote a computer program that spews gibberish like this once.
- edit: {{buzzword}} seems like it should suffice.