Talk:Historiography of the Nanjing Massacre

Orphaned references in Historiography of the Nanking Massacre

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Historiography of the Nanking Massacre's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Askew":

• From Nanking Massacre: Askew, David (2002-04-04). "The Nanjing Incident - Recent Research and Trends". Retrieved 2009-03-21.
• From The Rape of Nanking (book): "The Nanjing Incident". Electronic journal of contemporary Japanese studies. 2002-04-04. Retrieved 2007-07-21. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

This problem is fixed. Pretty cool bot. --Richard (talk) 02:54, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Recent Additions to this article

Recently, there have been several additions and reverts to this article, by Studiokazuyo. The majority of the changes are not sourced, and do not appear to be supported by pre-existing sources already in the article. On his talk page, Studiokazuyo has intimated that he feels the article is too "unbalanced," I would like to suggest that he read WP:NPOV, particularly WP:UNDUE; as claims of minimization of the massacre are not significant viewpoints among scholars in Japan or elsewhere, they should not be presented as such. In particular, they should not be presented as the dominant viewpoint, in Japan or elsewhere, which Studiokazuyo's edits have implied they are, and which they are not. Finally, I would like to call to Studiokazuyo's attention WP:IMPARTIAL, and note that the format and tone of his additions is not consistent with it, and that while Wikipedia should strive to describe historical disputes as they are in scholarly discourse (and there is no significant dispute in scholarly discourse on this subject, certainly not to the scale that Studiokazuyo's edits imply), she should not seek to advocate directly on behalf of any side, as Studiokazuyo's edits do. If, on the other hand, Studiokazuyo feels that there is some reason that his additions should remain on this page, in the same format or elsewhere, I would welcome him to write them here.Zmflavius (talk) 02:14, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Historiography of the Nanking Massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.japanfocus.org/products/topdf/3036

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Historiography of the Nanking Massacre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604111247/http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/columnists/story.html?id=a5ee988f-b445-4e20-b5e6-156e5d354532 to http://www.canada.com/vancouversun/columnists/story.html?id=a5ee988f-b445-4e20-b5e6-156e5d354532

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)