Talk:History of ABC Radio (Australia)

Very odd title

The two categories just do not work: "radio" and "regional" content? Errr ... is that regional TV content? What does "radio" mean aside from "regional": does it mean city and rural radio? Suggestions for a better title? Tony (talk) 14:32, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

• That's the name of the division of the Corporation. If you differ, have it up with them. CR85747 00:26 26 August 2009 (UTC)

No thanks very much. Why should WP slavishly follow administrative structures within an external organisation when there are better ways of framing subtopics? The division is likely to change, anway, so where would that leave the article? Tony (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,22065770-7582,00.html?from=public_rss
  • In History of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on 2011-03-30 03:47:16, 404 Not Found
  • In ABC Radio and Regional Content on 2011-06-19 22:35:25, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:35, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

• http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/0/43/top.htm
  • In History of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation on 2011-03-30 03:47:20, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'
  • In ABC Board on 2011-06-19 22:35:02, Socket Error: 'A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond'

--JeffGBot (talk) 22:36, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ABC Radio and Regional Content. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070903081543/http://www.acmi.net.au/AIC/RADIO_HIST_AUS.html to http://www.acmi.net.au/AIC/RADIO_HIST_AUS.html
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/0/43/top.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:20, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on ABC Radio and Regional Content. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://abc.net.au/corp/history/hist5.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://abc.net.au/corp/history/hist6.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://abc.net.au/corp/history/hist7.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071211232850/http://www.leighton.com.au:80/about_us/history/history.html to http://www.leighton.com.au/about_us/history/history.html
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://abc.net.au/corp/history/hist8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:50, 12 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on ABC Radio and Regional Content. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://abc.net.au/corp/history/hist2.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://abc.net.au/corp/history/hist4.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927215900/http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/0/43/top.htm to http://scaleplus.law.gov.au/html/pasteact/0/43/top.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://abc.net.au/corp/history/hist6.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://abc.net.au/corp/history/hist7.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://abc.net.au/corp/history/hist8.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:18, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 15 June 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

---

Moved to History of ABC Radio (Australia) this date. Kudos to all editors for your input, and Happy, Healthy Publishing! (nac by page mover) P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 23:38, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

---

ABC Radio and Regional Content → ABC Radio (Australia) – I actually listed it under redirects for discussion, but as afterwards noted, I don't think it actually needs discussion, and nobody has commented. Would someone be able to just move this page over the redirect, please? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:54, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Sam Sailor 17:49, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Note: ABC Radio (Australia) was turned back into a redirect so that this move request may move forward. P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 21:41, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with * '''Support''' or * '''Oppose''',then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

• Comment Seeing that this has now moved to a different forum, I'll just add a few reasons why I have suggested this move (and @Scorpions13256: who asked a question earlier on the Technical Requests page). "ABC Radio (Australia)" currently redirects to Australian Broadcasting Corporation#Radio, which does not seem correct because of the existence of this article, which started my whole train of thought, first intending to change that redirect to target this article, and then wondering about why this article had this name in the first place. Having trawled through a fair number of annual reports, going back to the earliest one available online (see list here) through to the latest (selection here: 1996-7 AR, see Appendix 5, p. 104; 2004-5, see App. 3, p.177; 2017, App. 3, p.144; 2018, App. 3, p.209 another restructure - Radio as an entity disappears; 2019, App. 3, p.215; 2020 org. structure), there is no mention of such a division name. Online, the ABC Radio menu choice leads to this page, headed "ABC Radio stations". It seems to me that if there was such a division in the organisational structure, it has been lost through successive restructures, plus radio today also includes podcasts and streaming, and there is an overlap with ABC News, so the "ABC Radio" name is just a general descriptor to capture history and an overall description of operations.

However, I have just realised an added complication. "ABC Radio Australia" redirects to Radio Australia, the Asia-Pacific radio station whose formal title is ABC Radio Australia (see home page). So I'm not sure what the best name is, but the current name, capitalised as it is, does not reflect any true entity that I can see. Open to suggestions. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I have just found the source of the title. In AR2007, p.70: "In February 2007 ABC Radio was renamed ABC Radio and Regional Content." This continues with AR 2008, p.76; and AR2009, p.39. In AR2010, p.176, it is again ABC Radio. So that's that mystery solved, at least. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 04:35, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

To editor Laterthanyouthink: since you have solved the mystery of this article's name, and since this article is about that entity that "was" and no longer "is", does that mean that you no longer think this article should be renamed? Wouldn't renaming to ABC Radio (Australia) be confusing with ABC Radio Australia and Radio Australia? and maybe even be incorrect? If this article is about an entity that is no longer in existence, which when it did exist it was named ABC Radio and Regional Content, then perhaps this article should keep its present name? P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 06:51, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

@Paine Ellsworth: The problem is that the article describes everything that constituted radio broadcast by the ABC, from 1923 right through to the present, and it was only briefly (for 3 years) named ABC Radio and Regional Content - purely an organisational unit and not terribly significant in the scheme of things... Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:24, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

To editor Laterthanyouthink: then what do you propose to dispel the potential confusion among the titles I mentioned, ABC Radio (Australia), ABC Radio Australia and Radio Australia? or do you think they won't be confusing to readers? P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 07:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

very often where organisations have changes of name and internal restructuring, a tendency of many editors is to want to rationalise the information to make things even more confusing - what is interesting is some australian state archives go to some length to delineate the changes in name - and whatever else - so that the institutional muddle is removed by the archival institution by having the changes laid out - and we are occasionaly lucky enough to have an editor prepared to have clear tabular information - similar to the mess of western australian railways:

[1]

I would argue that anything like the ABC and its various names and structures deserves clear indications - however slight the change might seem at first sight. JarrahTree 08:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Yes, you could be right, JarrahTree - but digging up all of the names is a huge challenge. Only more recent annual reports are available (I think from 1999?), and it's a long and painstaking task even going through them and trying to pick up what the organisational structures covering radio were called... I simply don't have that kind of time now, and may never. What about just using a descriptive name such as "ABC radio in Australia" (which should keep incoming links valid), and leave the harder task for another time (and another editor, hopefully!)? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

You say that this article describes everything that constituted radio broadcast by the ABC from 1923 through the present day. I wonder if History of ABC Radio Australia or ABC Radio Australia, 1923–present or similar would be more precise and descriptive? P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 09:19, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

I can hear laterthanyouthink's point - there is always the hope that some descriptor in nla/trove might have gone to the trouble already to delineate the various offshoots and whatevers. Also paine ellsworth's suggestion might keep things simple for the moment as hoped for by later. I am sure there is a good compromise possible. 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC) - damned squigglies in a weird format - JarrahTree 07:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Good thought about Trove, JarrahTree - many entries under varying names, with their organisation entry opting for the (rather generic) Radio Australia, with the variant names only fairly standard ones rather than a complete history. It says that this is based on the Libraries Australia authority record, whose source is "ABC WWW site, Sept. 11, 2002 (Australian Broadcasting Corporation operates ABC Radio). Observations from a moving vehicle, 1998 (name not given)". So not exactly a great authority! Thanks for your suggestions, Paine Ellsworth. Hmmm. History could be fine, if we just removed the List section altogether (a See also could suffice). The problem with anything containing the phrase "ABC Radio Australia" is that it could be confused with the international radio station. Is it worth considering a DAB? I will ponder further. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:17, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

p.s. Belated thought - "History of ABC Radio (Australia)"? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:21, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

That sounds good and appropriate; I would support History of ABC Radio (Australia). P.I. Ellsworth  ed. ^put'r there 14:58, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, Paine Ellsworth. I'll give it another day or two in case anyone else has any objections or better suggestions, and then move it. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.