Wikipedia

Talk:History of Abercrombie & Fitch

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Learn more about this page

A&F co. name actually earlier than 1904

edit
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is a harpoon gun on Gunbroker, with documentation dated 1898 that uses the "Abercrombie & Fitch Co." name.

Harpoon gun —Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.12.58.84 (talk) 15:14, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Detailed information

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have an issue with the current information. A while back, I included a sufficient amount of information. Granted, there were some grammer issues, but it was difficult to compile all the information. Nobody else ever took the time to research it and so I stepped up. Even now it seems I am the only one that adds new material, if not, the article would be so short and unreliable. What ticked me was that instead of fixing the grammar, people decided to just nonchalantly remove sentences. The paragraphs now sound extremely choppy and there is now no flow to it all. It is just expressionless and dull. This issue begins with the "Rivival of Abercrombie & Fitch" section and just gets worst as the reading continues (especially in the very last section). So much information that was included in the last section has been removed. Why? Collegues please try to include the removed information back into the article. We should not be preoccupied in making the article as short as we can because it just constraints it and gets in the way of constructing an article a pleasure to read. For a recap, there was information on the cost of the Home Office, how A&F did not lower price points after 9/11, ect. -- Hpfan1 )talk) 28 April 2008, 20:25 (UTC)

I don't know what you're referring to. The article appears to have steadily grown longer. I don't see any "revival" section. Do you mean "1988 through 1999: Revival of Abercrombie & Fitch". But in general, if there's sourced informaiton then it should stay unless there's a good reason to remove it.   Will Beback  talk  00:45, 29 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on History of Abercrombie & Fitch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:30, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Abercrombie & Fitch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Abercrombie & Fitch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:21, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on History of Abercrombie & Fitch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_Abercrombie_%26_Fitch&oldid=1220384497"