Talk:History of Algeria (1962–1999)

Untitled

Please expand the acronym "CNRA". I can't find an expansion for it on the net. Thanks! JesseW

And "ALN" and "GPRA", too. JesseW 02:32, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

They're explained in the previous part of the series. Gzornenplatz 02:35, Nov 20, 2004 (UTC)

Thanks, I've added expansions to this article, as should be done for the others as well. JesseW 06:15, 20 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Severe POV on "war aftermath"

Neither the colons nor the french governement have forbidden to the muslims to pursue graduating studies. It's not me who tells it, it's the university of Alger (http://www.univ-alger.dz/historique.htm). It doesn't mean that the graduated would find job opportunities in Algeria, but they would have been able to replace a part of the expulsated colons. Moreover, the colons have been forced to leave by the FLN. They don't have left in order to "punish" locals, but in order to save their lifes. To my opinion, the chapter "aftermath" contains propaganda. --— Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.121.1.26 (talk • contribs) 00:55, 17 February 2006, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.35.116.130 (talk • contribs) 19:15, 19 February 2006

Requested move and restore

The article was originally titled History of Algeria since 1962. Some but not all content on the 90s and 2000s were removed from the article here [1], then a "temporary fix" was introduced by moving the article [2]. This had the following problems:

1. Reorganization has unclear what's and why's, and also appers to be incomplete.
2. The 90's were left intact, making the new article name a misnomer.
3. Users seeking one thing (History of Algeria since 1962) are redirected to a different topic (History of Algeria (1960s to 1980s))
4. The users and editors are not instructed where the removed content was "moved" to.

My suggestion is that we revert everything (the content removal and article rename), to address the above mentioned problems.--Bxj (talk) 10:02, 14 May 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Algeria (1962–99). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130115052428/http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/dztoc.html to http://lcweb2.loc.gov/frd/cs/dztoc.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Source: Country Studies??

I've noticed that the last section of the "aftermath of the war" section discussion autogestion and the nationalization of resources is copy and pasted from the "country studies" source listed at the bottom of the article. Despite this, however, no quotes appear in the article and the source is not listed or cited in the references. I am also curious about the quality of this source. How do we know it is accurate/trustworthy? Is anyone here familiar with "Country Studies"? And/or is anyone willing to take on tackling this section of the article? I think it could be improved with some stronger, properly cited sources and some original wording! (also more clarity). Mmb2297 (talk) 05:15, 22 March 2023 (UTC)