This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
This article was copy edited by Dhtwiki, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 18–31 May 2021.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've tagged the article for a number of things. It's non-encyclopedic nonsense as it stands. I don't know (but am willing to be persuaded) that the subject needs an article at all - surely a section in the Rijeka article is enough. The main point is that it is entirely unsourced. Unless anyone comes forward with some sources, this article is for AfD in a couple of weeks. AlasdairGreen27 (talk) 23:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)Reply
Of course, thanks for the heads up. I must admit I actually rarely start merge discussions because the rationale tends to be obvious, but here this is not the case.
To me, it appears that Fiumans is a very narrow topic, with a dearth of sources, which arguably does not meet the threshold of standalone notability. It is merely a name for the mix of ethnic groups in Rijeka, so everything that can be said about Fiumans, can be said either in this article (History of Rijeka) or Fiuman dialect (another merge target that escaped me when I originally proposed this merge).
A possible point of contention is that History of Rijeka currently looks somewhat messy, so merging additional content into it would tend to make it worse. GregorB (talk) 14:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
