Talk:History of Singapore

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Former good articleHistory of Singapore was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 14, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
July 21, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
July 26, 2006Good article nomineeListed
August 9, 2006Peer reviewReviewed
August 8, 2006Featured article candidateNot promoted
February 18, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
June 7, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 January 2019 and 7 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cdalfons.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:44, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 21:37, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted per consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:52, 7 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA from 2006. The campaign for merger sections has a refimprove tag while numerous other areas are tagged with citation needed tags. Bambots reports "Unsourced passages need footnotes ((citation needed)) (July 2013, October 2015, October 2019, October 2020, October 2021, September 2022), Dead external links ((dead link)) (May 2020), ... (September 2022)". Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:05, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.