Talk:History of Società Sportiva Nola

Rewriting

Many parts of this article (like many others touched by Mr. Dynamic IP Address (93.56.24...)) is not written in English, not even in something near English. CapPixel (talk) 19:21, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

The parts of article not written in English, have been written by Kefalonitis94. Instead of criticizing edit it.

In fact, CapPixel continues to criticize the group of Ancona to make the merger. Seen that this group has extensively documented the reasons why we can not proceed, CapPixel that does not have consent forthe merger, denigrates his opponents with very pretext arguments.

How does not registered user to move a page, as you claimed? Are you tired to move it? --93.56.242.115 (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Man, you make me laugh!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=G.S.D._Nuvla_San_Felice&action=historysubmit&diff=437997813&oldid=435503891. You know that I can see your contributions, don't you? CapPixel (talk) 10:00, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Visto che sull'Ancona, hai scritto in italiano, ti rispondo in questa lingua.

Il problema della pagina sembrava quello del paragrafo "From foundation to 1996" scritto da Kefalonitis94, o meglio tradotto con Google. Quello che hai evidenziato, che era solo una frase, è stato modificato. Se comunque trovi degli errori li puoi modificare direttamente, senza mettere l'avviso. Ciao.--93.56.242.14 (talk) 05:22, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Mi dispiace, ma non posso perdere tempo a correrti dietro per correggere il tuo inglese, la cosa migliore sarebbe bloccarti per evitare ulteriori casini, ma con il tuo IP dinamico diventa una cosa improponibile, quindi mi toccherà aspettare l'inizio della scuola perchè tu abbia meno tempo di giocare. CapPixel (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Ah, comunque anche le tue ultime "correzioni" sono sbagliate, anche se più simili all'inglese. CapPixel (talk) 09:45, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Invece di continuare a lanciarci attacchi personali, per i noti motivi, perchè non modifichi cosa non va? E non rimettere ogni volta l'avviso, tanto per denigrarci. Ma vuoi il diaologo o la guerra? Ma non hai ancora capito che siamo un gruppo?--93.56.243.36 (talk) 05:32, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Attacchi personali? Ascolta, sto cercando di farti capire che non puoi lanciarti ad editare a caso senza sapere correttamente l'inglese sulla wikipedia inglese. Poi, potete essere 20 o 20.000, cosa usate tutti lo stesso pc? Non è normale... CapPixel (talk) 08:30, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Se uno sbaglia modifichi l'articolo senza accusare nessuno. Quindi le tue accuse sono molto pretestuose, se non correggi o indichi cosa non va. E gli errori degli altri non li trovi? Cosa c'entra l'IP con lo stesso pc? --93.56.243.36 (talk) 09:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

It is too easy to make a mistake and then think "well, I can do what I want, someone else is going to correct that." You have to learn that we're not here to play, wikipedia is a serious thing, not a child game.

The first dynamic IP numbers are fixed, only the last digits change: this indicates that the connection always comes from the same point. Anyway, I checked with some IP-tracking programs. CapPixel (talk) 11:11, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Tu non sei un amministratore, ma ti comporti come se lo fossi. Le tue accuse sono assurde: credi che si faccia apposta a sbagliare? Il testo sembra perfetto, ma tu dici che è sbagliato: quindi gentilmente o dici qual'è il problema o lo correggi, levando l'avviso.

Sei tu che ti diverti aprendo discussioni assurde come questa, solo perchè siamo gli unici che ci siamo permessi di bloccare la fusione e adesso vuoi farci fuori per fare cosa vuoi. Stai giocando a fare il dittatore, ma non ci facciamo mettere i piedi in testa, essendo qui tutti uguali. Quindi datti una regolata perchè non siamo il tuo zerbino.--93.56.240.111 (talk) 05:30, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

LOL! It's you that are trying to use me as a doormat, kid, asking like you were the owner of Wikimedia Foundation to move the article, because you're not able to do that by yourself: if you can't do that you could place a move request like any other good editor would have done. I'm going to correct your crappy English here as soon as I get here: I'm rewriting and updating the articles starting with Girone A. Meanwhile, you should stop editing and do your homework: start with the English lessons. CapPixel (talk) 11:17, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Tell me the truth: do you really think that a phrase like "The first championship was held from Nola to Third Division 1924–25, then won the Puteolana." or the section reguarding the fans are written in perfect English? CapPixel (talk) 18:23, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Guarda che quelle frasi non le abbiamo scritte noi! Verifica pure! Non accusarci per gli errori degli altri!

Nessuno si è rivolto a te, per fare lo spostamento: la frase era un cortese invito rivolto a chiunque volesse farlo, nessuno ti ha mai chiesto di farlo!

Quindi ora quello che abbiamo scritto va bene, prof. d'inglese?--93.56.241.209 (talk) 05:21, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

OK, we have a serious and urgent problem here... your English has basic syntax and grammar mistakes: they're not distraction errors, but systematic and repeated, like writing phrases like "it in the season 2010-11 from Eccellenza to Seried promoted" or something like that. It's lack of study.

About the article, you wrote "Il testo sembra perfetto" without specifying that you were talking about what you wrote. Anyway, it isn't perfect at all, and I'll leave the tag to make some moderators check on you. CapPixel (talk) 11:27, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Anche in italiano s'omette il verbo dicendo:" dall'Eccellenza promossa in Serie D", comunque non c'è problema basta aggiungere WAS.

Ti era già stato chi era l'autore di certi errori.

Quando hai voglia ci metti 5 minuti a sistemare la pagina e levare il tag, perdi più tempo nel continuare questa inutile discussione. Anche gli amministratori si chiederanno perchè non l'hai fatto e potrebbero venirgli strani dubbi. Comunque libero di fare come vuoi. --93.56.240.226 (talk) 05:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

OK, it seems you don't know Italian neither if you think that a phrase like (be aware that it only an example) "Nuvla San Felice dall'Eccellenza promossa in Serie D" is correct. However, English has a very strict structure (subject, verbs, complements) and you can't omit verbs or subjects, unless you think that colloquial English is acceptable for Wikipedia (and it isn't): so it's not only a matter of adding "was"... I'm curious now: where would you put that verb? And, if you really think it's a metter of minutes, why don't you correct the article by yourself? C'mon, I want to laugh. The author of the horrible phrase I quoted before is you. Moderators are here to keep wikipedia working in right track, they'll be grateful that I'm reporting you. CapPixel (talk) 08:40, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

La frase "The first championship was held from Nola to Third Division 1924–25, then won the Puteolana." e il paragrafo Fans non è stato scritto da noi, cosa abbiamo inserito è ora perfetto.

Visto che sei tu il prof. d'inglese e hai inserito il tag tocca a te correggere gli sbagli, sembra che non lo fai per accusarci degli sbagli degli altri. Così dimostri scarsa collaborazione. E ci vuole tanto ad scrivere was promoted? Meno tempo che a criticarci.

Quindi per favore collabora all'enciclopedia correggendo gli errori, non criticare ripoetutamente chi sbaglia e non insistere nelle discussioni quando non hai il consenso. Così vedrai che tutto andrà OK.--93.56.242.214 (talk) 05:24, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Kiddy, I'm rewriting almost all the Serie D articles (many were "touched" by you): you're not entitled to say anything about my contributions to wikipedia. If you need someone else to correct the articles because you can't write in English (and by keeping on writing Italian you're proving it), you should simply not edit here. CapPixel (talk) 09:03, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

OK, kid... now you did a very big mess: Atletico Nola is still an existent club, taking part to Eccellenza in this season. See this site. The club that should have been moved was Capriatese. In my opinion it's you that should move around the articles, since you did the mess, but you're probably not able to do that. I'm waiting for your "solution". CapPixel (talk) 10:26, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Prima di tutto ti confermiamo che siamo un gruppo, quindi nelle votazioni, come in quella del Todi, ognuno di noi partecipa a titolo individuale. Tra l'alto prevale chi fornisce le motivazioni migliori e non è una semplice somma matematica. Ma perchè crei gli articoli e dopo un anno li vuoi eliminare? Sei molto coerente! Ma se vuoi eiminare le squadre di Serie D perchè le crei, anche quest'anno? E poi perchè vuoi eliminare il Todi, che non è meno enciclopedico delle neo promosse, appena create?

Le risposte sono in italiano per facilitare la comprensione.

Finalmente abbiamo raggiunto lo scopo di farti modificare l'articolo. Quando li correggi perchè non verifichi mai il presidente e l'allenatore, che non sono quasi mai aggiornati? Le tue modifiche, verso i nostri contributi sono estetiche volendo riunire tutto in unico capoverso e con l'eliminazione del girone (ma perchè?).

Putroppo la situazione è cambiata, visto che il titolo sportivo dell'At. Nola doveva andare alla Frattese. Ma tutto si può facilmente risolvere. Basta trasferire i paragrafi riguardanti il Nola alla pagina dell'At. Nola, che c'è già, spiegandolo nell'edit summary ed avere così la nuova pagina del Nuvla. Sei d'accordo? Come vedi, per correttezza, verso di te non l'abbiamo ancora fatto e speriamo che ci sia reciprocità verso di noi. Ricordati che non siamo in guerra! --93.56.241.149 (talk) 05:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Tra l'altro sembra imminente il trasferimento del titolo sportivo, quindi sarebbe meglio aspettare, perchè andrebbe bene la pagina attuale. Cmq per favore non fare nulla senza consenso.--93.56.241.149 (talk) 06:36, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

First of all: I didn't cereate any new article this year, it was you, your imaginary friends (you make me laugh loud) and Kefalonis. I updated the fundamental information because as long as the articles are here it's important for them to be up to date. And I edit in my free time from my work, by the way, not when I have 2 minutes to spend to answer you. In one year time, I can change my mind whenever I want: now I know wikipedia much better and I know that Serie D team articles are not notable. Oh and the motivations you take are only "they are encyclopedic!"... Anyway, I already told you that I can track your IP and verify that you are not "a group" with sites like this: http://www.ip-adress.com/ip_tracer/ (telling the truth I use something more precise, but it's a job program). But it's even more easy: you and your friends only edit one at a time, never on the same time... why? One is reading the numbers, the other one the words and another one is writing crappy English? How funny! CapPixel (talk) 11:46, 29 August 2011 (UTC) PS: Frattese has merged with Neapolis several weeks ago, way before the move of this article. Since you did the mess, go and edit.

Ma sei un informatico? Il tuo sito localizza solo il nostro IP e allora cosa dimostra? Nulla! Non si può essere dello stesso posto? Siccome siamo molto organizzati e impegnati, ci diamo i turni per collaborare qua solo uno alla volta.

Ci riferivamo alla Polisportiva Frattese, non alla Virtus Frattese che doveva rilevare il titolo sportivo del Nola. Nell'articolo allegato ieri si parla di probabili trasferimenti del titolo quindi è meglio aspettare l'inizio del campionato, per avere la situazione definitiva. Ti va bene la proposta che Carlo ti ha presentato ieri? --93.56.242.94 (talk) 04:39, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Uuuhhh... so you're an organization and you spend so much time in writing a wikipedia article in the wrong way. C'mon, you're becoming annoying, stop playing: nobody is going to believe you. CapPixel (talk) 10:57, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Non abbiamo tempo a discutere del nulla, sinceramente è un problema tuo se non hai capito che siamo un gruppo, non dobbiamo avere la tua autorizzazione. Siamo persone del fare ed infatti abbiamo preferito modificare l'articolo, dopo averne discusso, seguando i consigli di Luca, anzichè quelli di Carlo. Ora sono stati risolti i problemi da te sollevati.

Questa discussione si può quindi ora considerare chiusa. --93.56.241.189 (talk) 05:43, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Perchè hai cancellato il file della Coppa Italia Dilettanti che ha vinto?--93.56.241.189 (talk) 05:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Oh, yeah, and what are Santa, Thor and little elf saying? I didn't delete anything. CapPixel (talk) 18:25, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Mentre tu leggevi i libri di fiabe, noi abbiamo risistemato la pagina. Hai visto che bel lavoro? Sei un gran simpaticone! --93.56.240.85 (talk) 06:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Here: take a candy for doing to wrong thing again! Do not put useless images like that, thanks. Obviously I had to correct to "work". CapPixel (talk) 11:31, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Perchè è sbagliato mettere la coccarda della C. Italia? Nella frase precedente avevi negato di averla cancellata! Se spiegavi subito il motivo non sarebbe stata reinserita! --93.56.243.2 (talk) 04:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Did I write that I deleted it? No, because I didn't. See, you can't even read... CapPixel (talk) 10:54, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Alla domanda: "Perchè hai cancellato il file della Coppa Italia Dilettanti che ha vinto?" hai risposto " I didn't delete anything". Non te lo ricordavi più? --93.56.241.246 (talk) 04:42, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Yes, and I repeated that: I didn't delete anything. Poor stupid fag. Learn English. I'm still waiting for you to clean the mess you did. Since you're "persone del fare" (ROTFL), you should have done that before... CapPixel (talk) 11:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Would you like to blocked for personal attacks? You is fag! --93.56.240.112 (talk) 05:12, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Again, you demonstrate you do not know the English language... you should have written "you are a fag". Or were you talking about one of your multiple personalities called "You"? Maybe you shall follow your lessons better. CapPixel (talk) 22:00, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

I ask you again: what's your solution for the mess that you created? Here's G.S. Capriatese, go and edit: you're "persone del fare"! (it's funnier every time I write it... please, write it again!) CapPixel (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Per favore parliamo in italiano perchè altrimenti non ci capiamo.

Ma vuoi il dialogo o la guerra? Quello che hai fatto sull'Ancona è semplicemente scandaloso ed indecente dopo 2 mesi che ti spieghiamo la situazione e se non hai pazienza non sei adatto a stare qua. Quindi smettila di ripristinare la tua versione assurda perchè è inutile discutere se poi fai di testa tua: qui invece si deve collaborare.

Non puoi attaccarci sempre per errori di battitura quando tu prendi i fischi per fiaschi, ma noi per tuo rispetto non lo andiamo a scrivere qua. O vuoi che lo facciamo?

Ti va bene ora la Capriatese? Altrimenti dì cosa non va, ma smettila di farci la guerra. --93.56.241.96 (talk) 06:03, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

I do understand with you write, it's you that do not understand. Besides, I write in English because this is the English wikipedia, not the Italian one: I regret to have done it for you to understand me. Moreover, your mistakes aren't typos, they're grammar and syntax errors. I already wrote on this talk page what's the problem with this page: read it. By the way, stop writing in plural, you're becoming annoying: nobody's going to believe you that you're a group of "persone del fare" (LOL). CapPixel (talk) 21:44, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Really no one believes you CapPixel and Dormannu are two different users. Your attempts to discredit us are failed miserably after your third vandalism. We do not have to have your approval and our mistakes are in good faith or typing, hand your are vandalisms. You should understand that one person alone could not fix all your trouble, luckily we are a group!

However, if you behave yourself, we are always willing to work with you! --93.56.240.79 (talk) 05:47, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm not going to agree to a person that can't write in English and still insist on writing on the English wikipedia. By the way, you write on the U.S. Ancona 1905 talk page you write that I "prefer to be clever"... don't you know that clever means "intelligente"? Probably not. And moreover yours are not typos: you write in English as it were Italian, translating directly "passato prossimo"... that has no corrispondences in English: you should use past simple. Than you write that you recieved reproaches and that you spend all the day correcting my vandalism... but in the same time you don't bring me any proofs of that. Still waiting. CapPixel (talk) 16:39, 22 September 2011 (UTC) ps: as you can see I had to correct your crappy English on the Capriatese article... that's the nth time that I have to do the teacher.

Double Identity

Dear CapPixel, have done in creating the user Dormannu a big vandalism. Do not get smart, do not deny the evidence useless. Connect in 2 different times, as you did yesterday after we pointed out, confirms it even more. You were naive in create a new user 5 minutes after your last edit. The administrators will see that you both use the same IP.

So stop to vandalism and take a break, otherwise you will be blocked. --93.56.243.36 (talk) 06:14, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

Agian, I'm not Dormannu. But, if you want, you can add him on your collection of fictional friends. Why don't you answer to my questions? I'm still witing to read those "rimbrotti" and my vandalism. CapPixel (talk) 13:06, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

So, persona del fare (hahahahahahahahahahahaha), are you going to fix the mess you did with this article? C'mon it's almost a month since you did this. Why do you want to keep separate articles for U.S. Ancona and A.C. Ancona but not for Nuvla San Felice and Atletico Nola? Guilty conscience? CapPixel (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

But make up your mind if you want to separate or merge the articles. This case is completely different from Ancona, as amply documented in his discussion. In addition, this article is entitled, and begins with Nuvla SF, instead your mess begins with AC Ancona that do not plays in Serie D.

However, if you want to separate the pages of Nuvla San Felice and Atletico Nola we do not oppose.

But now stop insulting us and agree a constructive dialogue, or just want to be reported and blocked? --93.56.241.97 (talk) 05:29, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Again, why should I fix a mess that you "persone del fare" (hahahahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahhaha) did? You want separated articles for a non-existent club, but not for two existing clubs: you contradict yourself. Is one of your fictional friends (ROTFL) able to do that? Or are you only capable of making empty accusations? CapPixel (talk) 07:41, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

The article is OK. If you who raised the issue. The situation between Ancona and Nuvla is completely different. And thank you that you do not not send the warning for vandalism No.3, but if you destroy again the pages of AC-US Ancona, as the last edit, you will arrive. You are at high risk of block. --93.56.241.97 (talk) 08:19, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

My god... I will arrive where??? That's a word similar to Italian, you should know its meaning... yes, of course they're completely different cases: A.C. Ancona and U.S. Ancona's articles should be merged, this two should be separated... because, you know, THEY'RE TWO EXISTING CLUBS WITH A COMPLETELY SEPARATE HISTORY WHILE PIANO SAN LAZZARO WAS RENAMED IN ORDER TO HEIR A.C. ANCONA'S HISTORY. IN CASES LIKE THOSE THE ARTICLES HAVE ALWAYS BEEN MERGED. But after discovering you were Dormannu, I'm really really fed up ad I will not take part to a discussion with you anymore: I'm 30 and have a family and I don't have much time to dedicate to a stupid kid like you. Accept my last piece of advice: learn English before editing again. CapPixel (talk) 18:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

We have not started us this edit war. In short, U.S. Nola is bankrupt in the far 1996 and since then more teams are born, how the page shows properly.

The AC Ancona has not yet bankrupt but it is in liquidation, the U.S. Ancona will be his heir only when will acquire its brand.

In any case you made a mess because the U.S. plays in Serie D Ancona, which must have its own page. Do you agree at least on this? --93.56.240.163 (talk) 05:21, 27 September 2011 (UTC)