Talk:History of World Championship Wrestling

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Thecleanerand in topic This article needs a rewrite
Former good article nomineeHistory of World Championship Wrestling was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 15, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed

Fair use rationale for Image:Original-nWo.jpg

edit
 

Image:Original-nWo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Merger

edit

Shouldn't this article be merged with World Championship Wrestling? Lex94 Talk Contributions Guest Book 20:09, 3 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Nomination failed

edit

After reading through the article and comparing it closely to WP:WIAGA, I have come to the conclusion that it does not meet the requirements needed for a good article. The following problems all need correction before this will be GA standard:

  • Criteria 1 (writing):
    • Lead section does NOT adequately summarize the article. See WP:LEAD. Basically, each section in the article needs some mention in the lead. Plus, the lead is self referential (the first sentance refers to the article itself in an awkward way) which should be rewritten to fix that. That is a minor problem, however, and of itself would have NOT caused a fail. The inadequacy of the lead in terms of summarizing the article is a much bigger problem, however.
    • The layout seems a bit lacking. The section titles don't really comply with the Manual of Style (some are too long, some are self-referential, and some seem hagiograpical-POV), and some sections seem a bit short. See WP:LAYOUT and WP:MOS for more information.
    • What's up with the slide-box on the notes section? The use of these in articles is deprecated.
  • Criteria 2 (referencing): The following statements or sections lack for ANY inline citation, and without specific inline footnotes, it is impossible to adequately verify the claims that they make:
    • "Since it was all they now saw, people began to believe that JCP was the NWA. Although JCP and the NWA were still two separate entities, with Crockett as NWA President, they were very much on the same page. The NWA was effectively an on-paper organization funded by Crockett and allowed Crockett to use the NWA brand name for promoting." This analysis is unreferenced at all. Where does this analysis come from?
    • "To preserve the inexpensive network programming provided by professional wrestling, JCP was purchased outright by Turner on November 21, 1988. Originally incorporated by TBS as the Universal Wrestling Corporation, Turner promised the fans that WCW would be the athlete-oriented style of NWA. 1989 proved to be a turnaround year for WCW, with Ric Flair on top for most of the year as both World Champion and head booker. Flair helped bring in Ricky Steamboat and Terry Funk, and his pay-per-view matches with were financially and critically successful. Young stars such as Sid Vicious, Sting, Scott Steiner, The Road Warriors, Brian Pillman, The Great Muta and Lex Luger were given major storylines and championship opportunities." Lots of info here, NO references. Where does this info come from?
    • "WCW later renegotiated the use of the NWA name as a co-promotional gimmick with New Japan Pro Wrestling and sued the WWF to stop showing Flair with the old NWA World Title belt on its programs, claiming a trademark on the physical design of the belt. The belt was returned to WCW by Flair when Jim Herd was let go and he received his deposit back plus interest. It was brought back as the revived NWA World Heavyweight Championship." unreferenced.
    • "The summertime saw the company's reputation take another hit due to a mishap at a live televised event. In 1993, Ric Flair returned to WCW from his WWF tenure, but was constrained by a no-compete clause from his WWF contract. In response, WCW gave him a talk show segment on its television shows called "A Flair for the Gold," in the mold of the old "Piper's Pit" segments from 1980s WWF programming starring "Rowdy" Roddy Piper. During a segment of the talk show on an August Clash of the Champions event building up the next month's Fall Brawl show, WCW decided to introduce a "mystery partner" for the babyfaces, a masked man known as The Shockmaster. The Shockmaster (previously known as "Typhoon" in the WWF) was supposed to crash through a fake wall and intimidate the heels. Instead, he tripped through the wall and fell on his face on live television, inadvertently rendering himself a joke character (despite winning some matches)." Unreferenced.
    • Aggressive competition with the WWF section has only one reference, and it is unclear if this one reference applies only to the last paragraph or to the whole section.
    • Dominance section has several paragraphs that are unreferenced.
    • Signs of a decline section has several parts that are unreferenced. Additionally, there is NO source for the data used to create the TV ratings graphic. Its a great graphic, and the article benefits from it, but we need to know whose ratings these are and where they come from specifically.

Otherwise, the article does appear stable, neutral (other than some of the section titles, see above), and uses images appropriately. However, the writing, organization, and referencing problems are so many that it does not appear that this article is close to GA status at this point. If the above problems can be fixed, please feel free to renominate this article. If you feel this review was handled inappropriately, please ask for remediation at WP:GA/R. If you have any other questions or need help, just ask at my talk page. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 04:10, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Wcw.jpg

edit
 

Image:Wcw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Competing with WWF

edit

Georgia Championship Wrestling could be seen as "going national" before the WWF. GCW was on cable in the 1970s. It changed its main titles (Georgia Heavyweight & Georgia Tag Team) to National Heavyweight and National Tag Team titles in 1980. It rebranded the TV show to World Championship Wrestling in 1982. It started promoting in places like Michigan and Ohio. All of this was done while the WWF remained in the northeast (and eastern Ohio), and still under Vincent James McMahon (Vince Sr.) For these reasons, I don't think its accurate to state it changed the name to compete with the WWF, GCW (or its stockholders and Ted Turner) had its own, independent desires to grow nationally. NWAjr. (talk) 03:37, 13 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on History of World Championship Wrestling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:21, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on History of World Championship Wrestling. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:47, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

NPOV dispute

edit

This article is written like a retrospective from one particular viewpoint, rather than a non-bias, neutral piece explaining the history of World Championship Wrestling. Unless news articles and reviews are being quoted and cited, there's no justification for it. Let people form their own opinions. MarcoPolo250 (talk) 14:21, 4 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Section header "WCW under Ted Turner (1988–2001)"

edit

This section needs a different name as it actually covers the years 1988-1993 post-Turner buyout, pre-Bischoff hiring. Romomusicfan (talk) 11:35, 2 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

This article needs a rewrite

edit

As you can see by this Talk page alone, this article has a serious problem with its tone. The lack of neutrality and the flagrant bias with no cited works to back up said unwarranted opinion is obvious. Stop ignoring the issue and do something about it. Wikipedia is not your personal blog.Thecleanerand (talk) 19:06, 6 August 2021 (UTC)Reply