Talk:History of artificial intelligence
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of artificial intelligence article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | History of artificial intelligence was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
| Current status: Delisted good article | ||||||||||||||||
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA Reassessment
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Consensus to delist. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 08:28, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
The talk page of this 2008 listing was tagged by SandyGeorgia as requiring a GAR; I must agree. The article has not been updated to the sufficient standard after 2010; this is especially egregious considering the massive leaps in AI over the last decade.
Thus, I'll tag it as needing an {{update}}, and nominate this for delisting as failing GA criterion 3. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 18:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
- I agree that this article needs huge amounts of work and updating to be at standard. Should be delisted unless someone takes that on. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:21, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- agree, should be delisted. Section for 2011 is really outdated and needs a huge amount of work Artem.G (talk) 06:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delist. Needs significant effort. If anyone steps forward to work on this article, please ping me. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 13:28, 10 July 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture
edit
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 15 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ferna235 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Thecanyon (talk) 05:33, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
19th century fiction
editShouldn't E. T. A. Hoffman's stories ( The Sandman (1816) and Automata (1814) ) be mentioned? Kdammers (talk) 21:08, 30 October 2023 (UTC)
- In my opinion, this article has too many fictional and mythological precursors already. CharlesTGillingham (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2024 (UTC)
AI has surpassed human intelligence in some specific fields
editWhy is it no relevant?
By 2023, generative artificial intelligence has already surpassed human intelligence in some specific areas such as the search for new proteins and strategy games.[1] 176.200.82.175 (talk) 08:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
References
- ^ "The scientists' appeal".
A paper by work of various university researchers ... in very narrow fields such as protein folding or strategy games, AI has surpassed human capabilities.
- I think this belongs in the article progress in artificial intelligence. This article is very long and we can only cover the most notable developments. ---- CharlesTGillingham (talk) 02:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
- Also, the article needs a major overhaul in the sections post-2010. This source may turn out to be useful in a rewrite. ---- CharlesTGillingham (talk) 02:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 202 - Thu
edit This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lotsobear555 (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Lotsobear555 (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Cut for brevity / lack of notability
editNone of the major overviews (Russell & Norvig, McCorduck, Crevier, Nilsson, Newquist) mention WABOT, as far as I know. ---- CharlesTGillingham (talk) 19:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
In Japan, Waseda University initiated the WABOT project in 1967, and in 1972 completed the WABOT-1, the world's first full-scale "intelligent" humanoid robot,[1][2] or android. Its limb control system allowed it to walk with the lower limbs, and to grip and transport objects with hands, using tactile sensors. Its vision system allowed it to measure distances and directions to objects using external receptors, artificial eyes and ears. Its conversation system allowed it to communicate with a person in Japanese, with an artificial mouth.[3][4][5]
- ^ "Humanoid History -WABOT-".
- ^ Zeghloul, Saïd; Laribi, Med Amine; Gazeau, Jean-Pierre (21 September 2015). Robotics and Mechatronics: Proceedings of the 4th IFToMM International Symposium on Robotics and Mechatronics. Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-22368-1 – via Google Books.
- ^ "Historical Android Projects". androidworld.com.
- ^ Robots: From Science Fiction to Technological Revolution, page 130
- ^ Duffy, Vincent G. (19 April 2016). Handbook of Digital Human Modeling: Research for Applied Ergonomics and Human Factors Engineering. CRC Press. ISBN 978-1-4200-6352-3 – via Google Books.
CharlesTGillingham (talk) 19:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Cut this as well for brevity. I'm under the impression that specialized hardware did not have last influence and wasn't widely used. Most work was on digital computers and the most influential work of the time (1980s) was theoretical.
A landmark publication in the field was the 1989 book Analog VLSI Implementation of Neural Systems by Carver A. Mead and Mohammed Ismail.[1]
References
- ^ Mead, Carver A.; Ismail, Mohammed (8 May 1989). Analog VLSI Implementation of Neural Systems (PDF). The Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science. Vol. 80. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1639-8. ISBN 978-1-4613-1639-8.
Biology
editWhat is biology 197.186.18.197 (talk) 19:02, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
History of AI
editArtificial intelligence 2409:4070:AEBE:4B7B:0:0:8849:A609 (talk) 01:39, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
قتال
editقتال الماء والنار وبعد تفوز النار على الماء 105.155.176.174 (talk) 17:56, 19 October 2024 (UTC)
Protein structure prediction
editThere is one domain where Deep learning (not yet called that) was successful as early as the end of 1980s, the prediction of protein structures. People like Terry Sejnowski started to use neural net to predict secondary structures
N Qian, TJ Sejnowski (1988) Predicting the secondary structure of globular proteins using neural network models. Journal of molecular biology, 202 (4): 865-884 (cited 1700 times)
And in 1993, Rost and Sander proposed a cascading neural net structure, PHD, that basically killed the field by reaching theoretical maximum accuracy.
Rost, Burkhard, and Chris Sander (1993) Improved prediction of protein secondary structure by use of sequence profiles and neural networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 90.16: 7558-7562. (cited 3900 times)
(well, the absolute best was actually PsiPred, an improvement by David Jones a bit later, using profile matrices rather than multiple sequence alignments
McGuffin, Liam J., Kevin Bryson, and David T. Jones (2000) The PSIPRED protein structure prediction server." Bioinformatics 16.4: 404-405. (cited > 4000 times)).
I was using those at the time, and for us, neural nets were very much a reality, beating any other type of algorithm. It is a niche usage, which is probably why we never see it mentioned anywhere. But these predated the works cited in the article by a decade. I am not too sure how to include mentions in this article. NicGambarde (talk) 21:19, 23 October 2024 (UTC)