Talk:History of artificial life

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The references in this article should provide good sources to cite most of what's in this article. --Numsgil 05:50, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

References

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It happens that the title of Langton's *paper* for the proceedings of ALife I is "Introduction", and Langton did not write a formal paper for the workshop. William R. Buckley 05:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Controversial statement

It is said that "Toffoli later provided a key proof that CAs were reversible, just as the true universe is considered to be". This a very controversial statement, since the universe is considered to be irreversible (not reversible) due to the thermodynamics. This is allegedly one of the reasons for not considering that artificial life is possible in silico, where processes are reversible.

Add topic