Talk:History of botany/GA2
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 13:14, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: found and fixed one dab.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 13:19, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 13:20, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Well referenced, references check out, assume good faith for off line sources
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- A good, but not over detailed summary with links to appropriate sub-articles
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
The text is awkwardly sandwiched between File:Mature flower diagram.svg and File:Angiosperm life cycle diagram.svgDone- Otherwise images licensed, tagged and captioned well
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
OK, on hold for seven days. Just some image re-arrangement needed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:40, 3 October 2010 (UTC)- Thanks for sorting that out. I am happy to pass this as a good article. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 00:49, 4 October 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Probably behooves us to be careful about off-line sources. This area has been subject to boosterism by Jagged85 and others, and claims have been copied around Wikipedia. I fixed one problem with this article, but there may be more. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 21:01, 4 August 2014 (UTC).