Wikipedia

Talk:History of ethanol fuel in Brazil

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Chidgk1 in topic GA Reassessment
Learn more about this page
Former good articleHistory of ethanol fuel in Brazil was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 8, 2009Good article nomineeListed
January 12, 2022Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

More carbon emissions

edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion
  Resolved
 – see below. —Cupco 23:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

"One couldn’t pick a worse place to harvest cane than Brazil’s Atlantic rainforest. There, sugar cane crops have led to deforestation and, paradoxically, more carbon emissions." Kozloff, Nikolas (April 9, 2010). "The Dirty Underside of Lula's Clean Energy Revolution". Foreign Policy.

"Brazil now ranks fourth in the world in carbon emissions, and most of its emissions come from deforestation.... the basic problem with most biofuels is amazingly simple, given that researchers have ignored it until now: using land to grow fuel leads to the destruction of forests, wetlands and grasslands that store enormous amounts of carbon. Backed by billions in investment capital, this alarming phenomenon is replicating itself around the world. Indonesia has bulldozed and burned so much wilderness to grow palm oil trees for biodiesel that its ranking among the world's top carbon emitters has surged from 21st to third according to a report by Wetlands International.... Deforestation accounts for 20% of all current carbon emissions.... no one checked whether the crops would ultimately replace vegetation and soils that sucked up even more carbon. It was as if the science world assumed biofuels would be grown in parking lots. The deforestation of Indonesia has shown that's not the case. It turns out that the carbon lost when wilderness is razed overwhelms the gains from cleaner-burning fuels. A study by University of Minnesota ecologist David Tilman concluded that it will take more than 400 years of biodiesel use to "pay back" the carbon emitted by directly clearing peat lands to grow palm oil; clearing grasslands to grow corn for ethanol has a payback period of 93 years. The result is that biofuels increase demand for crops, which boosts prices, which drives agricultural expansion, which eats forests. Searchinger's study concluded that overall, corn ethanol has a payback period of about 167 years because of the deforestation it triggers.... biofuels aren't part of the solution at all. They're part of the problem." Grunwald, Michael (March 27, 2008). "The Clean Energy Scam". Time.

Is there any reason this should not be included prominently? —Cupco 00:51, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

This article is about ethanol produced using sugarcane, not about biodiesel (palm oil), not about corn ethanol, not about Indonesia. Also be aware that this is a Good Article rated article, and all content is supported by reliable sources, not opinions or editorial pieces (the Brazilian Altantic rainforest was deforested a long time ago, not due to sugarcane crops). As a GA all content not supported by reliable sources or editorial pieces pushing a non NPOV will be promptly removed.--Mariordo (talk) 01:57, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Unless someone adds something about the carbon emissions caused by rain forest clear-cutting, then it does not meet WP:GACR 3(a) "addresses the main aspects of the topic" and 4 "represents viewpoints fairly and without bias" and should be delisted. What is your source for the implication that deforestation is not still occuring? According to Deforestation in Brazil, as late as 2005 Brazil still had the most rapid deforestation of any country. Why do you think those articles are editorial? They are WP:SECONDARY fact reporting from the past five years. —Cupco 02:11, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Please produce reliable sources, preferably academic peer-reviewed research results demonstrating your claim. The article already has several independent research results showing otherwise. Current deforestation is not being driving by sugarcane crops. Please check the facts and stop pushing your POV. Both EPA and CARB have rated Brasilian sugarcane as an advance biofuel.--Mariordo (talk) 02:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
To which sources "showing otherwise" are you referring? —Cupco 02:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Mariordo, this is my fault for not realizing that this is not a main article. I see now that Ethanol fuel in Brazil covers the issue well and with reliable sources. Please accept my apology. —Cupco 23:59, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on History of ethanol fuel in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on History of ethanol fuel in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on History of ethanol fuel in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:43, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on History of ethanol fuel in Brazil. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:History of ethanol fuel in Brazil/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

If you are willing to update this article please let me know and I will add more comments Chidgk1 (talk) 16:59, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_ethanol_fuel_in_Brazil&oldid=1207552342"