 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 10 January 2019. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining! Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Too much in need of updating to copyedit at this time. |
Cleanup
editFor this text to become an encyclopedic article, it needs to be cleaned up and the style needs to be improved. ←Humus sapiens ну? 05:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- It looks OK to me, though lacking for references other than the 1911 Britannica and excessively dependant on that one work. RJFJR (talk) 01:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
History
editIf this is the 'history' of pawn broking, then how concerned should we be that it is weak on material for the 20th century? RJFJR (talk) 01:03, 15 July 2011 (UTC)