Talk:History of rail transport

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of rail transport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721083013/http://www.sciencenews.gr/docs/diolkos.pdf to http://www.sciencenews.gr/docs/diolkos.pdf
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.die-tagespost.de/Archiv/titel_anzeige.asp?ID=8916
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721083013/http://www.sciencenews.gr/docs/diolkos.pdf to http://www.sciencenews.gr/docs/diolkos.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:07, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of rail transport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090512032233/http://www.stephensonloco.fsbusiness.co.uk/surreyiron.htm to http://www.stephensonloco.fsbusiness.co.uk/surreyiron.htm
• Added archive https://archive.is/20121129090905/http://ndpbeta.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/5385284 to http://ndpbeta.nla.gov.au/ndp/del/article/5385284

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:35, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Africa section

This section consists of mostly bare headings, (for African countries) with little or no copy.

Added WP article links, and a "See also" section, specific to rail history in Africa. That is probably not the ideal in an article, but thought it was preferable that seekers were clearly and obviously directed somewhere, (pending expansion of the section). In addition, prospective editors might be less likely to "re-invent the wheel" if they can clearly see that information relevant to this section does exist elsewhere on Wikipedia.122.105.94.165 (talk) 05:54, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Ancient Chinese railway

Is that bit about an ancient Chinese railway believable? I cannot find any indication of this find outside the website that is given as a reference. A second, ideally more scholarly, reference seems necessary. This also applies to Rail transport. --Wrongfilter (talk) 15:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

I recommend somebody with a little bit of sense review this article in it's entirety...

In particular... the following... >>>The Post Track, a prehistoric causeway in the valley of the River Brue in the Somerset Levels, England, is one of the oldest known constructed trackways and dates from around 3838 BC,[1] making it some 30 years older than the Sweet Track from the same area.[2] Various sections have been designated as scheduled monuments.[3][4][5][6]<<<

The wheel wasn't even invented in 3838 B.C. Thus I recommend this be removed. wbenton (talk) 16:12, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

If you read the reference, you'll see that it was used as a walkway rather than for wheeled wagons. Whether such a walkway deserves to stay in the article is another question... Bellowhead678 (talk) 20:43, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

When I was doing research for my rewrite of Train in 2021, I found the earliest instance of something train-like was a wagonway in Babylon, circa 2,200 BCE. So I think it's dubious to claim something from 3838 BCE is rail transport. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 01:43, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

References

Sweet Track

Were the Sweet Track and Post Track really railways? What is described is a roadway. 86.3.219.123 (talk) 07:04, 21 August 2023 (UTC)