Talk:History of same-sex marriage in Australia
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Recognition of same-sex unions in Australia was copied or moved into History of same-sex marriage in Australia with this edit on 12 September 2016. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
| Text and/or other creative content from this version of Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey was copied or moved into History of same-sex marriage in Australia with this edit on 19 September 2017. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of same-sex marriage in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090411044012/http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s51.html to http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/coaca430/s51.html
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.australianmarriageequality.com/wp/2013/07/26/media-release-report-clears-the-way-for-nsw-same-sex-marriage-law/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on History of same-sex marriage in Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222212423/http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1516/Quick_Guides/SSMarriageBills to http://www.aph.gov.au/About_Parliament/Parliamentary_Departments/Parliamentary_Library/pubs/rp/rp1516/Quick_Guides/SSMarriageBills
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150703203834/http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2015/07/01/cross-party-plan-reached-on-same-sex-marriage.html to http://www.skynews.com.au/news/top-stories/2015/07/01/cross-party-plan-reached-on-same-sex-marriage.html
- Replaced archive link https://web.archive.org/web/20130806075051/http://www.australianmarriageequality.com/wp/2013/07/26/media-release-report-clears-the-way-for-nsw-same-sex-marriage-law/ with https://web.archive.org/web/20130809011909/http://www.australianmarriageequality.com/wp/2013/07/26/media-release-report-clears-the-way-for-nsw-same-sex-marriage-law/ on http://www.australianmarriageequality.com/wp/2013/07/26/media-release-report-clears-the-way-for-nsw-same-sex-marriage-law/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141125204956/http://www.bdm.nsw.gov.au/bdm_mge/bdm_rel.html to http://www.bdm.nsw.gov.au/bdm_mge/bdm_rel.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141116073243/http://www.samesame.com.au/news/11595/Same-sex-marriages-are-now-protected-in-NSW-law to http://www.samesame.com.au/news/11595/Same-sex-marriages-are-now-protected-in-NSW-law
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131206053856/http://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/19983366/hundreds-rally-in-support-of-gay-marriage/ to http://au.news.yahoo.com/nsw/a/19983366/hundreds-rally-in-support-of-gay-marriage/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131202232131/http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2013/10/25/16/07/gay-marriage-case-hearing-likely-in-dec to http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/2013/10/25/16/07/gay-marriage-case-hearing-likely-in-dec
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
The lead
editIn reference to User:Al-Andalus, do you really think your edits to the lead section were at all constructive and/or helpful? Do you honestly think they were "written in a clear, accessible style" and concise in accordance with WP:LEAD? This is an all too common occurrence, where relatively straightforward overviews on LGBT related articles (particularly Australian ones) get amended in a way that makes them overly wordy, and endlessly difficult to follow, and which arguably contravene WP:NPOV. For those interested, here are the differences b/w the intro as it stood and Al-A's last edit to it. Would be happy to hear what you have to say in response User:Al-Andalus. Jono52795 (talk) 12:12, 16 December 2017 (UTC)