This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I've never seen such a gigantic article that doesn't have at the very least a single picture, preferably in the lead. The only picture in this entire article is in the infobox for Chinese science and technology in general. That's rather odd. Can someone bother adding some decent pics to the article to match the gargantuan amount of text? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PericlesofAthens (talk • contribs) 16:50, 25 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
this article is heavily sourced and pov. It reads like an essay someone wrote for a class or a blog. This is not how Wikipedia articles should be written. 5.56.148.195 (talk) 18:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I meant to say, the article is heavily under-sourced. And poorly formatted. Besides the issue of pov which I already addressed, there are whole sections of the article filled with ridiculous Wikipedia hyperlinks like “wax” + ”crystal” etc, swaths of information that need sources that have none. 5.56.148.195 (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
