Talk:History of science and technology in the People's Republic of China

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 5.56.148.195 in topic sources

Pictures

edit

I've never seen such a gigantic article that doesn't have at the very least a single picture, preferably in the lead. The only picture in this entire article is in the infobox for Chinese science and technology in general. That's rather odd. Can someone bother adding some decent pics to the article to match the gargantuan amount of text? — Preceding unsigned comment added by PericlesofAthens (talkcontribs) 16:50, 25 December 2011‎ (UTC)Reply

sources? npov?

edit

this article is heavily sourced and pov. It reads like an essay someone wrote for a class or a blog. This is not how Wikipedia articles should be written. 5.56.148.195 (talk) 18:11, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

sources

edit

I meant to say, the article is heavily under-sourced. And poorly formatted. Besides the issue of pov which I already addressed, there are whole sections of the article filled with ridiculous Wikipedia hyperlinks like “wax” + ”crystal” etc, swaths of information that need sources that have none. 5.56.148.195 (talk) 18:14, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply