Talk:History of social work

Started Article

The article is mostly copied from Social work however I have written a little on American History. It's a little annecdotal, so myself or another editor needs to expand and add some analysis to it. The main section could be tidied up and expanded as well.--rakkar (talk) 06:22, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

Why is there no mention of the sterilisation of "undesirables", under which 'social workers' acted as judgement, in the early 20th century? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.33.18 (talk) 14:51, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, User talk:87.102.33.18. The obvious answer is because no one has written it. Do feel free to add a referenced paragraph on the topic if it is of concern to you. --rakkar (talk) 22:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

HIST 208 Peer Review (Canadian History)

For the most part this is a very well written article. Adding the Canadian history heading to this article helps expand and helps educate the reader, especially because Canadian history in most of these stubs is overlooked. There are very good references and a lot of research that had to be done to complete this article. Grammar and punctuation do not seem to be an issue and everything is grouped in paragraphs nicely. A way that I thought could make the article jump off the page a little more would be by adding a picture. It could help pull the reader in and make him or her want to read the article. One other thing that might help would be removing the couple red statements in the article that do not link to any other page, or incorporate another word that links to the topic instead. Adding more content to this article to make it 2500 words is also required for our class. All in all I found this a very good article and it was very interesting. I had never thought about the history of social work in Canada, and I’m glad I got a little bit more educated by reading it. It was a job well done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tanissteinbach (talk • contribs) 20:11, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Another HIST 208 Peer Review

Your additions to this article are very informative and organized. The adding of a section on the Canadian history was a superb idea and very educational in itself. The separate sections of the article are logically and chronologically arranged which aids the reader by directing focus to specific time periods. I think the edits you have made are excellently done and cannot see anything wrong with this article, well done. Cmeyer8 (talk) 20:46, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Many many of the articles in the category 'Social Work' are very very messed up. This is one.

I just removed this random phrase with no period from the end of a paragraph about halfway through the article: 'mother of palawan society' It was just hanging there and had no sensible relation to anything. That seems to be the case with many of the articles in this Category Section. Random nonsense sentances (or even paragraphs) misspelling things, unclear, no punctution, bad formatting. In fact, i have been systematically reading the pages in this section, and I am not lieing, the past 5 articles from the category i have read, IN A ROW, are fucked up. Look at my edit history, I have made changes in articcles right before this edit. I am actually not lieing. That is pretty bad when you go to a category and read the articles and you get messed up articles that need a lot of help 5X in a ROW. At random!! This Category section needs serious help. I do not have the time to edit them all either, I have to read aboout things.

Sections

For some reason there are two "Canadian history" sections, both before and after the section "American history." Epigrammed (talk) 19:24, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Both sections appear to have been written by students as part of a school assignment and rely on just one or two citations for a substantial amount of text. The first section additionally seems to contain tangential digressions on the Cold War and peace movement, and its style seems overly conversational. I would recommend merging the two sections by integrating information from the first into the second, then removing the first. - J. Conti 108.20.137.173 (talk) 02:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

pre-Constantinian Christian social work

This section makes it seem like Christianity was only involved in charity and social justice in the post-Constantinian era. That isn't true. I don't have the references at my fingertips to support an edit right now, but this section should be changed. History_of_social_work#Pre-modern_antecedents Sondra.kinsey (talk) 16:43, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of social work. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080828041756/http://learningcurve.gov.uk/victorianbritain/caring/default.htm to http://www.learningcurve.gov.uk/victorianbritain/caring/default.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.socialwork.ed.ac.uk/social/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:44, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of social work. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110718211919/http://www.family-action.org.uk/section.aspx?id=1155 to http://www.family-action.org.uk/section.aspx?id=1155
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090123052812/http://jrf.org.uk/about-us/history.asp to http://www.jrf.org.uk/about-us/history.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012011147/http://www.jrf.org.uk/centenary/poverty.html to http://www.jrf.org.uk/centenary/poverty.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714233116/http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/takingliberties/staritems/712beveridgereportpic.html to http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/takingliberties/staritems/712beveridgereportpic.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Pre-organised social work practice in Africa before the advent of colonialism

What does is it mean 197.189.181.31 (talk) 12:09, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: ENG 21011 Research Writing

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 17 January 2024 and 12 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tsapeg, KaraWilmoth, GavinLane22 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Groundhogluv, Madisweatt, Mwell249, BlueKnight8.

— Assignment last updated by Wordnerd104 (talk) 15:06, 12 March 2024 (UTC)