Talk:History of the AmigaOS 4 dispute
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reopened case
edit"On 1 September 2010 Hyperion Entertainment opened the case again claiming Amiga Inc. violated the settlement."
Do you really think that this sentence based on interpretation of one news site citing single (!) comment on some community site should be even mentioned here?Pavlor (talk) 07:34, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- I admit I am not sure anymore. It came from the official spokesperson and shareholder on the official Amiga site but it is quite weak. I dont object removal at this point. Xorxos (talk) 22:15, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
- Good, I removed it. We must wait for more reliable informations about this topic, eg. proclamation on offical company website, lawsuit etc.Pavlor (talk) 11:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
- Carefull, there's somebody falsifying this "news" in here, and other articles about the Amiga. Apparently, to legitimize the fraud, usually using bogus news articles (only apparent after you read them), or links to sites he owns or posts he makes himself. Hyperion's article also had them. I'm surprised he hasn't been sued by either Commodore in Holland or Hyperion.21:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.132.91.116 (talk)
- I dont know who is frauding who and what. We should not speculate on intents of announcements nor let personal preference distort Wikipedia. Xorxos (talk) 09:22, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
- Carefull, there's somebody falsifying this "news" in here, and other articles about the Amiga. Apparently, to legitimize the fraud, usually using bogus news articles (only apparent after you read them), or links to sites he owns or posts he makes himself. Hyperion's article also had them. I'm surprised he hasn't been sued by either Commodore in Holland or Hyperion.21:04, 10 January 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.132.91.116 (talk)
- Good, I removed it. We must wait for more reliable informations about this topic, eg. proclamation on offical company website, lawsuit etc.Pavlor (talk) 11:10, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
Direct consequence of dispute result is transfer of "Amiga" name to CommodoreUSA,since its all Amiga Inc has got. Rastavox (talk) 22:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of the AmigaOS 4 dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101106184210/http://www.ann.lu/comments2.cgi?view=019991231173706&category=news to http://www.ann.lu/comments2.cgi?view=019991231173706&category=news
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)