Talk:History of the Romanian language
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of the Romanian language article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Thraco-Roman page were merged into History of the Romanian language. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
"traits of many changes of the Latin which occurred in the 4th and 6th centuries"
editI've requested examples for this claim more than a few months ago. It does not seem to appear anywhere in standard academic literature at the moment, in fact the understanding now seems to point at the opposite:
"Developments appear to have been significantly different in the Balkans, in particular in the sub-Danubian area, where the Daco-Romance varieties can be reasonably assumed to have arisen." - Barbato - The Early History of Romance Palatalization
As such the claim attributed to Vekony might be a minority view and should not be the lead of the paragraph.
Leaving this entry here in case other editors want to discuss about it. Aristeus01 (talk) 20:18, 13 June 2024 (UTC)