Talk:History of the Socialist Left Party
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the History of the Socialist Left Party article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Subject Matter Export needed
editFor the 2011 backlog elimination drive, I have rewritten the entry's opening paragraph in the most objective, long-term view I know how. While at present this provides a strong lead into this entry for overall re-write and editing, I am not sufficiently knowledgeable to edit its detailed content.
An expert can perform this -- and may decide to rewrite the opening paragraph, too (which is fine). However, I don't know how Wikipedia encourages expert improvements for its entries.
(Also, why does so much of the same suject remain in this party's separate entry in the first place?)
--Aboudaqn (talk) 20:58, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
- I hope it's OK, but after copy editing I removed the {{expert-verify}} tag as well. The article is reasonably well cited. Also, it is clearly still under development (see all the empty sections near the end). I don't think there are grounds for calling upon special expertise here at the moment. --Stfg (talk) 15:43, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Arising during December 2011 copy edit
editRemoved sentence
editIn the second paragraph of the "Communist Party and founding (1975)" section, I removed the sentence: "Seeing that the Socialist People's Party, who had received most of the votes for coalition, had only received one of four of the political office positions for the coalition.[7]" because it is not a complete sentence and its relationship with what preceeds and/or follows it is unclear. If anyone wishes to clarify that, FN7 was as follows:
- <ref>{{cite news | author = Stemland, Jens Henrik | title = Ingen Kommunistuvilje i Oslo SV, Men Nei Til Jørgensen Personlig | work = [[Verdens Gang]] | date = April 23, 1975 | page = 3 | language = Norwegian |accessdate = February 21, 2010 }}</ref>
--Stfg (talk) 14:10, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Schei Committee contradiction
editThe "Electoral activities (1977–81)" section mentions the establishment of the Schei Committee to investigate Furre and Gustavsen. However, it links to the article Schei Committee, which says that the committee "concluded its work in 1962". --Stfg (talk) 18:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Punishment of the party?
editSame section: how might not prosecuting Furre and Gustavsen punish the party? --Stfg (talk) 18:06, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of the Socialist Left Party. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100702145822/http://home.online.no/~b-aardal/k_f_valg.pdf to http://home.online.no/~b-aardal/k_f_valg.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)