Talk:History of the Swiss Air Force/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

This is a nice piece of work! It could use a box with the insignia of the Air Force, etc. This will not hold up its review any longer, but I'd appreciate your adding it at your convenience.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   I realize these are your own pictures. Some museums prohibit the publication of their exhibits.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   really nice job! It you're going to take it further, you'll need to get the A review at Military History, and they will help with the rest of the Manual of Style issues, and the box. Nice nice job. Auntieruth55 (talk) 23:10, 26 September 2009 (UTC)