Talk:Hitotsume-kozō
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
So Many Articles, So Few Sources
editOften I read comments in the Talk Page expressing dismay that some editor went through an article and sprinkled it with [citation needed] on every line. "If you don't like uncited pages, cite them yourself," seems to be the sentiment. To which I say, "gladly, show me any book about Hitotsume-kozō and I'll do the hard work myself." It seems this article was plagiarized from Obakemono Project. I reworked several of the sentences, but can find no independent articles indicating Hitotsume-kozō was indeed part of Japanese folklore. I'd love to be proven wrong, I just don't know where to look. Duende-Poetry (talk) 23:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed, but really only one "Citation needed" template per sentence is needed. I removed a few, as they were redundant. Boneyard90 (talk) 15:45, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hitotsume-kozō. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071110200707/http://www.sony-ef.or.jp/library/rakugo/2_ex.html to http://www.sony-ef.or.jp/library/rakugo/2_ex.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)