Talk:Holby City series 1/GA1
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Frickative in topic GA Review
GA Review
editArticle (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:03, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Toolbox |
---|
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: I fixed one disambiguation link.diff
Linkrot: No dead links found
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- The artcile is well referenced, no dead links, references are reliable sources, no dead links
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Broasd, thorough and focussed
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I am happy that this article meets the GA criteria, so am happy to list it. Congratulations. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 14:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Thank you very much for your review, and also for the copy edit. Some of the typos that had slipped through were shameful, thank you for catching them! Frickative 15:33, 24 April 2010 (UTC)