Talk:Hollywood High (video game)
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Andrewa in topic Requested move 19 January 2017
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hollywood High (video game) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Hollywood High" video game – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives
editMan, I haven't touched this in a LONG time. I'm surprised someone edited this last month. Are there any public archives of Hollywood High scripts? (I did see a couple of good ones on Theatrix's web site... is it still up? Well, I lost my files.) --134.48.103.32 15:38 06 Apr 2006 (GMT)
I have doubts that this software is actually abandonware since nothing on the web mentions this, or has copies of the software. Anyone have proof of this? Rpgman456 15:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
Requested move 19 January 2017
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: pages moved. Andrewa (talk) 14:55, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
– The video game does not rise to the level of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 22:23, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support absolutely agree. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose due to proposal being based on pure opinion and offering no objective facts with which to evaluate the subjective claim that the video game "does not rise to the level of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC". I reserve the right to change my mind should objective and persuasive basis for this proposal be presented. Let me know. --В²C ☎ 00:47, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- The game article has very poor sourcing—it's hard to argue that it's the best known "Hollywood High" when others exist. czar 20:16, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support "per subjective claim that the video game 'does not rise to the level of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC'", aka judgement. The real high school alone is more notable. — AjaxSmack 02:05, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support – agree that no primarytopic makes most sense here. Dicklyon (talk) 07:20, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support. Not a notable video game, let alone more notable than the other examples. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK 12:37, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- Support. No primary topic here. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.