Talk:HoloLens 2

Microsoft Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Computer graphics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mixed reality?

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Multiple refs in this article call it augmented reality, and the CNN link even says "When Microsoft first unveiled a rough version of its augmented reality technology in 2015 — which the company insists on calling "mixed reality" — it was genuinely mind-blowing." Can we just call it 'augmented' instead of using this fake 'different' term of MS's? Malick78 (talk) 15:15, 30 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Article image is HoloLens 1

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article image is HoloLens 1, not HoloLens 2! They're quite different! 81.101.153.215 (talk) 00:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Repeated addition of penny stock

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is an apparent effort to repeatedly add information about MicroVision, a penny stock, to exaggerate their importance and inflate their stock price. The sources lead to a dead link and to a blog. The blog does not indicate that MicroVision was an equal partner in developing HoloLens 2 and relies on a YouTube video. The book is copyrighted 2001, more than 15 years prior to development of HoloLens 2, and does not mention HoloLens 2. Furthermore, the chapter cited was written by a MicroVision employee.

For the mentioned reasons, I am deleting paragraphs related to MicroVision that are not reliably sourced or rely on original research. Please add such information only with sources that meet Wikipedia standards.

I may request page protection if additions are made that are not encyclopedic. Yammie2009 (talk) 06:37, 9 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic