Talk:Holy Resurrection Church, Mborje
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Holy Resurrection Church, Mborje. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706071224/http://kshk.gov.al/index.php?fq=brenda&gj=gj2&kid=19 to http://kshk.gov.al/index.php?fq=brenda&gj=gj2&kid=19
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Translation additions
editThis article contains a translation of Kisha e Ristozit from sq.wikipedia. (979743516 et seq.) |
Unsourced statement
edit@Zenel888 The claim that this church is one of the oldest churches in the Balkans
must be supported by a reliable source. To my knowledge, no source in the article verifies this claim, and it appears to be original research. I have raised concerns about the lack of sourcing multiple times, which you have disregarded. I will remove the statement again. If you revert it without citing a single source, I will have no choice but to report this behavior. Thanks. --Azor (talk). 22:56, 23 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Azorzal The source is literally cited beneath it. The page was already like that I didn’t change anything until you come to that page after an argument on tiktok that we had which u later also left and coincidentallye enough you edited the topics that we talked about and I also have proof of this. Looking at your recent edits u have a story of changing Wikipedia pages mainly revolving around Christianity and historical figures of Albania. Ur behaviour has already been reported just letting you know. Zenel888 (talk) 19:33, 24 August 2024 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you're accusing me of, and frankly, I don't even want to know. As for the article, none of the listed sources support that statement - it appears to be pure original research. Additionally, the article is inconsistent about when the construction of the church occurred, further underscoring the need for a citation to back up such a claim. If someone requests a citation, you should provide it instead of engaging in back-and-forth reverts. It is very disrupting to other editos wishing to improve the credibility of an article. --Azor (talk). 21:45, 24 August 2024 (UTC)