Talk:Home shopping
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 October 2021 and 9 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jw6740.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:47, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Unwarranted Censorshop
editOn the 26th January, without prior discussion Flowanda removed a section on the history of Home Shopping specifically deleting references to online shopping, a form of home shopping on the grounds of inadequate sources. The online shopping reference was from the UK.
This editor has also removed other items from other articles on the same grounds. One would think that this may be a part of the 'if it isn't peer reviewed, it can't be a source' debate raging elsewhere. Bearing in mind that the other references qouted in the article are US magazines, perhaps it is something else altogether. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Santanaquintass (talk • contribs) 17:17, 28 January 2010 (UTC) Santanaquintass (talk)
- Editing is not censorship. This discussion should be continued at Talk:Michael Aldrich. Johnuniq (talk) 10:55, 29 January 2010 (UTC)
- "Editing is not censorship" LOL oh really? 71.84.126.174 (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
- Johnuniq, I've again removed the content per WP:RS, so please help with any discussions here or reverts. Flowanda | Talk 10:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
- "Editing is not censorship" LOL oh really? 71.84.126.174 (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)