Talk:Hongō-Sanchōme Station (Tokyo Metro)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by JPG-GR in topic Requested move

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was move. JPG-GR (talk) 06:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Recently, a disambiguation was created at Hongō-sanchōme Station and a new station article was created at Hongō-Sanchōme Station (Tokyo Metro) (note the caps). However, a disambiguation is not necessary as the two stations are located at the same place. Plus, "sanchōme" is officially lowercased. Source: [1] [2]. It's not like the people who had created the Hongō-sanchōme Station links beforehand didn't do any research first. I propose placing the station article at Hongō-sanchōme Station. —Tokek (talk) 14:20, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Support move - It is natural to have one article to cover both stations. The fact that the stations are only connected by public road is not a problem. --Sushiya (talk) 02:06, 3 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Cleanup needed

edit

The article as it stands is a bit of a mess, with details of the Toei Oedo Line, despite it supposedly being the Tokyo Metro station article. I'll be happy to tidy up, but I will wait until the article has been moved and renamed. --DAJF (talk) 14:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

It ended

edit

Integration was ended. Please wait for the inside a little. --Nishi-Kyo (talk) 11:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually, the move request was a rename to Hongō-sanchōme Station, not Hongō-Sanchōme Station, for the reason stated above. Is that okay? The actual move can wait a little. According to WP:RM "Most move requests are processed by a handful of RM regulars who are familiar with ... page moving procedures." Usually these people have administrative privileges to carry out this task. —Tokek (talk) 15:23, 5 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I agree that the article should still be moved to Hongō-sanchōme Station rather than Hongō-Sanchōme Station, as per the original request. --DAJF (talk) 04:40, 6 May 2008 (UTC)Reply