Talk:Hong Kong Disneyland
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hong Kong Disneyland article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Currency
edit@Citobun: I feel that, since the resort is joint owned by an American company and the Hong Kong government, it is necessary to say the specific currency in every instance throughout the article. I personally was confused and wondering which currency the latest expansion's price was in. Elisfkc (talk) 17:33, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- I concur with Elisfkc on this question. I did indeed find the currency values confusing when reading an unadorned '$' symbol. This article is of specific interest to both audiences interested in Hong Kong and those interested in Disney theme parks, and particularly considering that this park is a joint venture, I think it would be useful to always disambiguate the currency as HKD or HK$, and I think this would fall within Wikipedia style. Scott Roy Atwood (talk) 21:23, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia style, per MOS:CURRENCY, is to disambiguate the first instance. It is not necessary to disambiguate every instance that the currency symbol occurs, per the MOS. Would we write "US$" every time a currency symbol appeared in a United States projects owned by a Hong Kong conglomerate, i.e. Brickell City Centre? Of course not. Citobun (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- I realize it was a rhetorical question, but for what it is worth, I would be delighted for the Bricknell City Centre to use US$ throughout, since there is ambiguity due to the Homh Kong ownership. Scott Roy Atwood (talk) 03:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- That is not Wikipedia style. Citobun (talk) 03:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Citobun: Wikipedia style is not a hard set rule, but more of a guideline. Per the top of MOS:CURRENCY "This guideline is a part of the English Wikipedia's Manual of Style. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply. Any substantive edit to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on the talk page." Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- That is not Wikipedia style. Citobun (talk) 03:55, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- I realize it was a rhetorical question, but for what it is worth, I would be delighted for the Bricknell City Centre to use US$ throughout, since there is ambiguity due to the Homh Kong ownership. Scott Roy Atwood (talk) 03:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia style, per MOS:CURRENCY, is to disambiguate the first instance. It is not necessary to disambiguate every instance that the currency symbol occurs, per the MOS. Would we write "US$" every time a currency symbol appeared in a United States projects owned by a Hong Kong conglomerate, i.e. Brickell City Centre? Of course not. Citobun (talk) 02:57, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Archiving
editAdding ClueBot III's script to archive this talk page. Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Hong Kong Disneyland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=11&art_id=34507&sid=11427047&con_type=1&d_str=20061220&sear_year=2006
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140606220440/http://www.teaconnect.org/pdf/TEAAECOM2013.pdf to http://www.teaconnect.org/pdf/TEAAECOM2013.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071015072623/http://thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=20&art_id=32372&sid=10991562&con_type=1&d_str=20061122&sear_year=2006 to http://www.thestandard.com.hk/news_detail.asp?pp_cat=20&art_id=32372&sid=10991562&con_type=1&d_str=20061122&sear_year=2006
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151018203544/http://www.aecom.com/deployedfiles/Internet/Capabilities/Economics/_documents/Theme%20Index%202011.pdf to http://www.aecom.com/deployedfiles/Internet/Capabilities/Economics/_documents/Theme%20Index%202011.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150604105413/http://www.teaconnect.com/.../files/TEA_103_49736_150603.pdf to http://www.teaconnect.com/.../files/TEA_103_49736_150603.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:24, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hong Kong Disneyland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080317115619/http://www.fool.com/news/associated-press/2007/12/18/hong-kong-disneyland-fails-to-hit-target.aspx to http://www.fool.com/news/associated-press/2007/12/18/hong-kong-disneyland-fails-to-hit-target.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110524234821/http://www.hongkongdisneyland.com/eng/discover/2003index.html to http://www.hongkongdisneyland.com/eng/discover/2003index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
"Disneyland Manila" listed at Redirects for discussion
editAn editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Disneyland Manila and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 21#Disneyland Manila until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. MB 02:01, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA23 - Sect 201 - Thu
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 September 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): PortiaGui (article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by PortiaGui (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2023 (UTC)