Talk:Honghuzi

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Organized crime task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Refs for future use

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

would be nice to translate and import parts of it. 76.119.30.87 (talk) 15:49, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Despite this article's length, I barely consider it a start of an encyclopedic article and I almost assessed it as a stub. Wikipedia articles should be concise. Including great swathes of quotations from out of copyright reminiscences does not improve an article quality during assessment. If anything, this practice detracts from an article. The quotes in this article make it so long that I gave up reading. These long quotations add no real value to the article and it would be far better to provide just a brief summary and leave the quotations for Wikiquote or Wikisource. What is needed is the analysis that can be found in secondary and tertiary sources as these contain the necessary synthesis of the facts contained in the reminiscences. - Cameron Dewe (talk) 04:01, 25 April 2022 (UTC)Reply