Talk:Hoop skirt
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2601:601:9B81:1F50:D0C8:99E7:79F7:DD11 in topic There may be an incorrect word in the “Hoop skirt” article.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Latest version
editTo see the latest version of the "hoop-skirt", look at image "1er prix : Gaëlle costumée en anneaux de transport" (constellation_ chevron_1_concours_de_costumes_2.jpg) on page http://www.constellation-conventions.com/article.php3?id_article=245 Churchh 04:31, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Edit war
editPrevious edit was a shot in an edit war, when consensus hasn't been reached. Please cease and desist until the community reaches consensus. The Editrix 12:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
- You're the one who's unilaterally trying to impose her strange categorizations on Wikipedia, without even having the common decency to offer the remainder of us peons on Wikipedia one single shred of meaningful explanation. The fact that you've been silent on your user talk page for three days now (while very actively editing on Wikipedia all the while), indicates that you have no meaningful explanation to offer -- and that being the case, I feel no hesitancy in reverting to the categories that were there before you started unilaterally imposing your individual agenda. Frankly, your high-and-mighty accusations of "edit-warring" don't go very well together with your refusal to offer any meaningful explanation for your uncooperative unilateral actions (which others have called into question as well as my self).Churchh 12:59, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
Categories
editThis article was recategorized in 2006 in accordance with a scheme for organizing articles in Category:History of clothing. |
That effort has been superseded by WikiProject Fashion. |
Please join that project or see its talk page for further discussion. |
There may be an incorrect word in the “Hoop skirt” article.
editI think that the word “revelation” in the “Hoop skirt” article possible should be “revolution” instead. 2601:601:9B81:1F50:D0C8:99E7:79F7:DD11 (talk) 07:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)