Featured articleHoover Dam is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on September 30, 2010.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2010Peer reviewReviewed
July 2, 2010Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on April 20, 2004, March 1, 2012, March 1, 2016, March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2024.
Current status: Featured article

Hoover Dam

edit

I have pictures of what Is called the “Stairway to Heaven”. It is the 700+ foot stairwell in the Hoover Dam in case the elevators fail. The pictures are about the midway point. They curve because the dam curves. Dhendershot (talk) 00:19, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Look like this? [1] SilverReaper (talk) 03:07, 13 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

What of it? 2A00:23C7:E287:1900:D030:E8F5:F817:839A (talk) 12:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lynn Atkinson

edit

Listed in several websites as the engineer for the project. What’s the story? 2A00:23C7:E287:1900:D030:E8F5:F817:839A (talk) 12:34, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

The only source I've been able to find is a single article in the LA Times that so claims in passing. Other sources list his company as one of those which submitted the second-place bid for the project. Do you have strong evidence that Atkinson was engineer for the project?--Wehwalt (talk) 15:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Problem with the dam's Power/Energy specifications

edit

I was looking at the specs for Hoover Dam and spotted something strange ...

Installed capacity 2,080 MW

Capacity factor 23%

Annual generation 3.3 TWh (12 PJ) (2020) [3]

But 12 PJ divided by seconds in a year is 380 GW, not 2 GW. I don't know where the error entered the stream, but 12 PJ is definitely not consistent with 2.08 GW as the installed capacity rating. YodaWhat (talk) 22:05, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I would suggest removing any erroneous figures.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:47, 24 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

2022 explosion

edit

@SPECIFICO: the consensus was to merge it. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 Hoover Dam explosion. We have to put at least a line down for a merge to be done. Iamreallygoodatcheckerst@lk 22:36, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

The closing administrator found consensus to merge but then it becomes up to the editors of the involved articles to decide if there's useful content to merge. See WP:MERGE. There's no useful content to merge. Two different editors have reverted additions on this.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:41, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
Absolutely insignificant, a huge waste of time, and an object lesson in letting at least 45 minutes pass before creating a new article based on a fire engine out on a routine call. Look at all the editor and admin time that could have been used on something constructive instead of cleanup. SPECIFICO talk 23:26, 27 July 2022

"2022 Hoover Dam exposion" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect 2022 Hoover Dam exposion and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 13#2022 Hoover Dam exposion until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:38, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply